You call that a screw up?
Don't you see? (reread the thread)...
If sexual evolution is a screwup for evolution, as you said:
Self replication, a process seen as a basic process found in the 'beginning', should increase chances of survival. And with its increase chance of survival, how come no animal can do that today?
I consider it a genetically superior trait, something that should still be around today in things besides bacteria.
emphasis added
you also said it was "some statistical absurd chance". After that you say that actually god is responsible for it, so therefore god has "screwed up" by creating things the other way.
This lack of those superior things is the same kind of screwup for god as it is for evolution.
But, as someone trying to help, let me inform you that you have
gravely misunderstood what the Theory of Evolution postulates.
Lamarckian evolution is long gone as it is an impossibility.
What the current, actual Theory of Evultion does postulate works fine and doesn't even contradict the Bible.
You can check it off along with natural selection, mutation and adaptation.
Then we can discuss where you've misinterpreted the Bible