Criticizing neo-Darwinism

There is an opinion that non-German Universities influenced by German pre-war thinking have more relaxed stance towards neodarwinism. Uni Prague should be probably one of them.

I wrote a post regarding using of English and German language in the research of evolution at EvC thread Human evolution:EvC Forum: Creation of the English LanguageIn the past days animals represented moral qualities of mankind. Nowadays according neodarwinian school they are doing nothing else but "struggling for their life" from the morning till the night. Such views are nothing else as "sociomorph" modelling of prevailing reality in society and putting it into Nature. Nowadays it is "competition" with it's most bizzare idea of Dawkins' "Selfish gene".Edited by Admin, : Fix link.

The more more noble animal the less the "struggle for life". That's the reason the kings of the past put on their coats of arms lions etc... But according neodarwinism they should have put there rats. They are more proliferous, more "selfish genes" remain after them. But the neodarwinian school doesn't accept notions as "noble animal" even though every child and every unprejudiced person perceive it as a fact of life.

Professor Zdenek Neubauer UNI Prague has criticised neodarwinism and "selfish gene" concept in his books repeatedly. Professor Zdenek Neubauer published as a very young scientist several articles on microbiology, also in the Nature.

Neubauer: A brief consideration on the meaning of the lysogenic conversion. Nature (1967) 213:1263

​

Oppenheim, Neubauer, Calef, Antirepressor: A new element in genetical regulation. Nature (1970) 226:31
Oddly enough there is no possibility to discuss "selfish gene" concept at EvC. I don't know if idiots "Admin" and "Adminnosy" have ever published any article at any scientific journal. But these idiots and neodarwinian fanatics block any discussion here about the topic. The idiot Admin Percy has closed an open thread and started abusing me as "dumb", "foolish" etc.EvC Forum: Selfish gene - neodarwinian mysticism?These neodarwinian idiots here who are in the charge of forum called the names and banned also professor John Davison who criticises the neodarwinian hoax in his Evolutionary Manifesto.I don't see why the forum is called "Evolution and creation". It should be called "Biased forum run by neodarwinian idiots".Edited by Admin, : Fix link.