Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Ghost of Hitler
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 285 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 61 of 65 (429207)
10-18-2007 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by bluescat48
10-18-2007 8:11 PM


Re: message 30
so am i to believe that all Atheist-evolutionists hate Protestant Christians, and that all murderers are atheists?
Well of course, dammit. Otherwise creationists would be ... liars.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by bluescat48, posted 10-18-2007 8:11 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by bluescat48, posted 12-10-2007 1:26 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2477 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 62 of 65 (439793)
12-10-2007 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by bluegenes
10-03-2007 9:14 AM


Bump for Hitler Discussions
bluegenes in the O.P. writes:
Hitler seems to have been haunting the EvC threads a lot recently.
He's often off topic. It seems to be part of the old bastard's character.
That's why I think that he and the Nazis should have a thread of their own. On topic here is anything about Hitler's beliefs and those of other Nazis. Also, any thoughts as to the reasons for the rise of Nazi-ism.
Discussion of the roles of economics, religion, biological theories, and philosophy in the rise of Nazi-ism are definitely on topic.
Two months after I wrote that, the Ghost of Hitler is with us again, particularly in a thread on the ToE and morality.
The O.P. on this thread is deliberately very broad, and all aspects of Nazi-ism can be discussed, leaving the other thread freer to decide whether or not scientific theories give us our morals.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by bluegenes, posted 10-03-2007 9:14 AM bluegenes has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4190 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 63 of 65 (439795)
12-10-2007 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Dr Adequate
10-18-2007 8:16 PM


Re: message 30
I rest my case.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-18-2007 8:16 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5033 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 64 of 65 (463504)
04-17-2008 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by bluegenes
10-03-2007 9:14 AM


double post
sorry
Edited by Brad McFall, : removed double post

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by bluegenes, posted 10-03-2007 9:14 AM bluegenes has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5033 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 65 of 65 (463505)
04-17-2008 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by bluegenes
10-03-2007 9:14 AM


Hitler and Darwin
antiLIE quoted Hitler
quote:
But let's not speculate, lets see what Hitler says; "Because everyone who believes in the higher evolution of living organisms must admit that every manifestation of the vital urge and struggle to live must have had a definite beginning in time and that one subject alone must have manifested it for the first time. It was then repeated again and again; and the practice of it spread over a widening area, until finally it passed into the subconscience of every member of the species, where it manifested itself as 'instinct.'" - Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler; Volume Two - The National Socialist Movement; Chapter IV: Personality and the Conception of the Folkish State
http://EvC Forum: EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed - Science Under Attack -->EvC Forum: EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed - Science Under Attack
but also said there:
quote:
We know that this was not Darwin's fault.
refering to human killing of humans.
I don't know that Darwin himself can get out from the thumbnail polish so easily.
The problem IS that Hitler combined "vital urge" and "struggle to live" across the Earth which is not the way that Darwin covered the same ground. But I do see, think and feel that Science itself has not really gotten to decide fully for Darwin's specific view. I reason that Croizat had a better take on it. Darwin did allow other checks than the specific struggle but Hitler did not witness the "correlatio of organization" statistically. His own actions created the vital stats.
AND Hitler combined BACK to the first cause, whatever that might be speculated to be for Darwin, without noticing that seperate creation was argued agasint (IN THE LOCAL REGION that AHitler had as "area")) or rather Hitler had to have assumed that vital whatevers were "isolationistic" per life and deaths. That seems a bit more petacostal for my own view even if I thought I had apphrenended something of the relevant theology.
There is an intellectual link between Nazism and Darwinsm but BECAUSE as I said, I do not find science having decided specifically to or absolutely exactly in Darwin's sense (differening interpretations of this sense are what we have at present) this is only an "academic" exercise and not something that is in practice.
I do not find this link to be what is wrong with Evolution from the creationist prespecitve. Rather the probelm exists in some guise in the videos from Don Exodus (in another thread) where he simply relates "evolution" to 'descent' without even making the distinction Hitler did between 'vital urge' and 'struggle to live'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by bluegenes, posted 10-03-2007 9:14 AM bluegenes has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024