Hi Beretta,
I can only refer you again to
Message 1. The only thing your position has in common with Rob's position described in
Message 1 is your use of the word "faith". Maybe you're not familiar with Rob's views, but he has a very religious outlook. He thinks that science uses the same faith to support its theories as he does in believing that when he dies his soul goes to heaven.
Your argument, actually more than one but I'll attempt to sum them up under a single umbrella, is that the assumptions underpinning mainstream science (what you're calling a "worldview") are insufficiently supported with evidence and are of questionable validity.
Why don't you just propose a new thread (over at [forum=-25]) to discuss what you'd really like to talk about, the ill-advised adoption of naturalistic assumptions by science. In other words, you really want to talk about naturalism, not faith.
Please, no replies.
-- | Percy |
| EvC Forum Director |