Why did Adam and Eve feel the need to cover their sexual organs upon realising that they were naked?
To become aware that one is “exposed” {a.k.a. naked} does not necessarily indicate “shame.” The Orthodox translation and interpretation of the “Adam & Eve Myth” is now such an integral part of our psyche that “shame” and the “human genitalia” have become synonymous. However, that is not necessarily what the Hebrew Eden Narrative is conveying.
Attaining the knowledge of what is beneficial and what is harmful {a.k.a. the knowledge of good and evil} would open one’s mind to the “beneficial/good” as well as the “harmful/bad” aspects of one’s reality. That which would pose a threat to one’s existence - what would be regarded as “harmful/bad” - would naturally be most intensely recognized.
In Hebrew lore the “fig-tree” is regarded as a symbol of “security & protection; prosperity & peace.” The Hebrew term for “girdle, belt” is not just used to describe “loin-covering”, it also denotes “a warrior’s belt.” Therefore, “Adam & Eve” can be seen as “girding” themselves with “security & protection” as they become aware of the potentially hostile environment in which they find themselves.
After hearing “thunder” {a.k.a. the voice of God} amidst the “wind” violently rustling through the garden (Gen. 3:8) “Adam & Eve” hide themselves amidst the trees of the garden. God then calls unto “Adam”, “Where are you?” (Gen. 3:9) - as if God does not know where one of His creations is hiding - but this prompts “Adam’s” reply, “I was afraid because I was naked.” This reply defines the context in which the Hebrew term for “naked” is applied; it pertains to “fear”, not “shame”.
The Hebrew term used in Gen. 2:25 {traditionally rendered “naked”} is a completely different word and actually means, “sensible, prudent.”
What do you think?
Ger
™ Version 4.2
