Inerrant Bible Manuscripts?

Greetings,One more ignorant foo. I am no Christian believer. I believe in theistic evolution. I Posted those links for my original claim in order to correct their errors. Sometimes when you read websites they don't explain the entire truth and it is hard to discern from truth and lie. So, I used thie knowledge of EVC forum and people like your self and of course MR. Athiest in order to prove Fraudulency.

---

Thanks
FitzgeraldR

Greetings,A 3 minute google was how I found my links =)

---

Thanks
FitzgeraldR

Not a kung foo i hope?Hardly a fool when I know your stance, I highlighted your link becuase it was your link and for no other reason. I never implied your believed the info. No one is saying you are. Well, you are at least half a fool. So, you are too thick to actually defeat these morons by yourself? What is hard about it? 'kin hell man a 5 year old can demolish AiG!! So what can you do to the people you discuss things with? Well, if you have to resort to these tactics you are as thick as they are.Why not try being honest?We are all happy to help.Brian.This message has been edited by Brian, 11-08-2005 07:39 PM

Greetings,To sum it all up. I feel it is wiser to speak with people "live" then to read websites alone.

---

Thanks
FitzgeraldR

I hate reading websites, IMO you cannot beat going to the library and reading the netire contents of someone' book.Seriously Fitz, you should have been honest because there are many people here who would be happy to help you out, it's no big deal, just not a good way to start things off.I hope you hang around, we can learn from each other, so welcome aboard.Brian.

Brian,Sounds good.p.s. sorry about the foo comment CA attacked me and I felt as if you were attacking with the post about the links. Anyways.

---

Thanks
FitzgeraldR

You need to learn to differentiate between someone attacking you and attacking your messages. CA was not attacking you, but only what you posted. Sorry, but ideas are meant to be attacked, tested, challenged and criticized. That is the only way they can be tempered.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Respectfully, the immaturity of your argument seems exceeded only by the quality of your responses to the contempt that those arguments so fully deserve. In my opinion, you really need a time out.

Greetings,You're correct. I need time out. I work somewhere in the mist of 60 hrs per week. 2 children 6 and 2 months old. I go to college and am taking nursing classes. SO respectfully you could not be any more correct. I need time out.

---

Thanks
FitzgeraldR

Just a little suggestion here.You jumped right into a thread of your own as your first posting experience here. And I think more people responded than you had anticipated. It can seem a little as if everyone is attacking you at once.One good way to deal with that is to pace yourself. Maybe set a number of replies you can comfortably handle per day, and don't exceed that. A message can wait a few days for you to reply. As you slow down your rate of replying, you will usually find that the responders slow down to match.Take a break for a day or two. Then when you come back to the thread, pace yourself at a rate you can handle without feeling overwhelmed.

---

..

I agree. Everything I have researched points to the Textus Receptus as the oldest. (not the oldest codex, but the oldest content)

---

Agent antiLIE of the AGDT
7x153=1071 [ VIII:XXIV]
I klinamaksa exei afypnistei

Fitz, I am requesting your opinion rather then to debate you. I believe the most accurate of the modern bibles is the N.A.S.B. My teacher has explained to me that it is the closest english translation from greek available. What is your outtake on this.

tO: FORCEAll English Bible translations have banned 16 names of the Gods (the God & the Lamb; Rev 22.1).All English Bible translations have blasphemed Genesis 1.1.All English Bible translations have blaphemed Matthew 1.1.But then -- the MSS cannot be blamed for this.The Jews added about a million fake vowels to the Masoretic text.The Jews even brag about changing, "He Is" (Gen 2.4: HWHY) to "the Lord." They say that the name of God is too sacred to be pronounced, and so they change it to something else. Which is more irreverent, A) to mispronounce the name of God; or: B) to intentionnaly change the name of God?Men have been writing for centuries that the names in the Bible translations are fake. When I was 10 years old, 65 years ago, I was taught that "Christ" is a corruption of "Christos"; meaning, "Anointed." Anointed is banned 490 times.
Plural "Gods" (MYHLA) is banned 6,400 times."God of her (Israel)" is banned 42 times.In 1706, Matthew Henry translated "plural Gods" correctly in his commentary on Genesis.God is leading up to "Revival 2015."sl33w

sl33w,Do you have any links to reference that information besides your claim? I am interested in learning more about that claim.

---

Thanks
To believe in "Force" is to believe in Love, Wisdom, Intelligence, Force, Agility, and Charm.