Darwin's Debt to Christianity

I don’t have a problem with the science that is associated with Evolution. But I do disagree with the idea that mutations are chance events. At the most basic level mutations are a result of quantum physics. So for me the changes in living things are caused by quantum outcomes that are observer determined. This scenario has, for me, a better fit in explaining the way life changes in the real world than the idea of chance mutations. Edited by no1nose, : No reason given.

Life changes and I don’t have a problem with that. But the Theory of Evolution has some bad baggage assoiated with it. One of these is the idea of random mutations. For me the idea of observer determined quantum outcomes at the genetic level provides a feedback loop and would explain the changes that do happen much better than the idea of random.Perhaps it could be tested statistically on the premise that conscious guided changes would achieve quicker and more direct changes in living things. And would produce far fewer mutations than if changes were purely by chance.Edited by no1nose, : No reason given.

What am I suppose to think? You are in fact stalking me. Because of that I am advised not to respond to any further posts from you. Period You must learn to give people a choice.