it is NOT meant for such a theory to be accepted, because it is not a tested proven law.
General Relativity IS a law. GR goes perfectly with the BBT.
and such as it is, but a stepping stone in the right direction with some truths and half truths on to the path of the hopeful : TRUTH.
If you are going to define truth as ONLY what your faith helps you believe, then no amount of evidence will ever suffice.
have not yet participated with a debate on this topic in which the debaters where searching for a greater understanding by :
a: identifying and acknowlodging faults.
What faults?
c: searching for a way to check or double checked the observed new answers by experimentation or mass logic.
Mass logic? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
it should not be surprising that on questions with which a guess must be made because you lack understanding of the question, or data, that the guesses of the majority are almost always the correct answer. but that is : almost always.
You do understand that you are making a case against the belief in God with that statement right?
the singularity is inevitable
Not with all theories, some theories don't have a singularity.
which, as long as two forces are, the question "before that" is relevant.
First you need to devote a long time to studying what the 'forces' are before you can just guess where they came from or how they act.
T=0 is inevitable.
You do understand that T=O isn't the moment when time began right?
the fault, is the arrogance, and unwillingness, of science as a whole to endorse God.
Shouldn't that read , "the fault, is the arrogance, and unwillingness, of science as a whole to endorse the CHRISTIAN God."
What if science endorses Zeus, would you be ok with that?
"ALL HAIL ZUES THE MIGHTY CREATOR OF T=O", how would that work?
which is: that God is.
Let me understand you right, you say that science is incomplete with its theories and mathematical predictions and then turn around and give this statement, 'God is'!!! What does that mean? Can you clarify any of that? Do you have any experiments or observable tests to justify that statement?
You can't argue sciences incompleteness with 'God is'.
With your logic anything 'just is'. That clarifies nothing.
your consciousness to live in a body that lasts forever more,
Thats your ego talking there, YOU think you last forever. Typical ego-centric religious babel.
so for that: it is those who believe who will see. and not the other way around.
What will you see?
i hope one day you or perhaps others who debate the topic of the start of the universe and all things; will debate honestly.
We are trying to but, that entails us excluding superstitions about invisible beings who duel in the minds of the delusional
and look for the truth by observing.
Without speaking metaphorically how have you observed God?
All great truths begin as blasphemies
I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth.