Who claimed that "God created" is scientific. I certainly didn't. You have created a giant strawman.
You absolutely did, you liar. In message 22 you reply:
onifre writes:
Right, but where did the DNA come from?
It came from the design of God as well as a myriad of other things did.
But the most hilarious bit comes from this:
"God created" is definitely not scientific by definition. It is a faith. That faith has been proven to over 2 billion people (argumentum ad populum). I repeat it is not scientific. It is faith based.
So you repeat MY OWN POINT back to me, and quote the name of a LOGICAL FALLACY to support MY OWN POINT!? You are the worst debater I've ever seen.
You are also deeply misinformed about the nature of evidence and faith.
The faith is founded on evidence. Some of that evidence is historical documents, prophecies fulfilled, miracles performed and documented, testimonies of eyewitnesses, archeology, and much of the evidence is also scientific.
Proof happens every day in the courtrooms. That proof goes way beyond the realm of science. But science is often part of that proof. That's where my faith lay. It's a combination of all those evidences above. I've not limited myself to just natural knowlege like you have. There is much more knowledge in this world that is not scientific. You may want to try and learn some sometime.
I don't think that you are trolling, because I'm quite accustomed to the level of ignorance of fundamental aspects of science that ID proponents display. I find it funny that you add in little jabs at my understanding, as though they would faze me.
Edited by Mylakovich, : formatting
Edited by Mylakovich, : spelling
™ Version 4.2