Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Have complex human-made things been designed?
AlphaOmegakid
Member (Idle past 2901 days)
Posts: 564
From: The city of God
Joined: 06-25-2008


Message 51 of 85 (481107)
09-09-2008 11:58 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by bluegenes
09-09-2008 4:10 AM


Bad Analogies !
bluegenes writes:
You've brought us neatly back on topic there. I agree, the design does follow an evolutionary pattern....
I am going to show you the problem with you analogy in this one sentence. Your analogy works only if there is an intelligent designer. If there is an intelligent designer then your analogy makes sense.
However, you don't, nor does science believe that there is an intelligent designer. There is no design in evolution. Zilch, nada.
Organisms aren't designed. They are randomly generated by nature.
Many have written that organisms have the "appearance" or the "illusion" of being designed. Herein lies the magic. It is the illusion of design that comes from the slight of hand of millions of years. There is no magic with the designer. Only the evolutionist.
Emmergence is the "poof" of evolution. There is no "poof" with a designed product. The product is produced according to a designed plan of pre-existing elements. Emergence is the "poof" of millions of years and spontaneous generation.
bluegenes writes:
Unfortunately for this view, religion doesn't fit the pattern of science, which, when there are divisions of opinion, will always eventually unite in the direction of the evidence.
This is only true for the non- religious elements. With the religious, even though scientific evidence may show one thing, they will still believe their religious convictions irregardless of the evidence. Note: this doesn't mean the religion is false. Abiogenesis and spontaneous generation has never died even though it was disproved 150 years ago. It is a religious default philosophy in light of the discovery of the law of biogenesis.
bluegenes writes:
Belief in the soul and some sort of "afterlife" is the one basic religious belief that seems to exist in all known cultures, so it seems unlikely that the Israelites were an exception, don't you agree? I think that if we had a time machine and could go back to any point in the history of our species that we could find this kind of belief, but I don't know if I could present evidence for this.
Of course, because the Bible must be discredited as evidence, because it is the only recorded history back to the beginning when the concepts of body soul and spirit first originated and are well documented in the book.
No the Israelites were not the first to understand immortality. Adam understood it very well until he wasn't allowed to eat from the tree of life any longer. But this is just mythological fables, and it cannot be allowed as evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by bluegenes, posted 09-09-2008 4:10 AM bluegenes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by bluescat48, posted 09-09-2008 12:11 PM AlphaOmegakid has replied
 Message 57 by bluegenes, posted 09-09-2008 2:10 PM AlphaOmegakid has not replied

  
AlphaOmegakid
Member (Idle past 2901 days)
Posts: 564
From: The city of God
Joined: 06-25-2008


Message 54 of 85 (481119)
09-09-2008 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by bluescat48
09-09-2008 12:11 PM


Re: Bad Analogies !
bluescat48 writes:
Abiogenisis is life coming from organic & inorganic chemical substances coming together with the help of catalists such as lightning, ultraviolet radiation & nuclear radiation.
What does it take to get through your head that "life coming from organic & inorganic chemical substances coming together with the help of catalists such as lightning, ultraviolet radiation & nuclear radiation." is exactly the same thing. It is the concept that chemicals can spontaneously organize (generate)to create life. Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation of microbial life, not maggots. Abiogenesis and spontaneous generation are synonyms. There is no discernable difference that you can show.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by bluescat48, posted 09-09-2008 12:11 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by AlphaOmegakid, posted 09-09-2008 1:50 PM AlphaOmegakid has not replied
 Message 56 by AdminNosy, posted 09-09-2008 1:50 PM AlphaOmegakid has not replied

  
AlphaOmegakid
Member (Idle past 2901 days)
Posts: 564
From: The city of God
Joined: 06-25-2008


Message 55 of 85 (481120)
09-09-2008 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by AlphaOmegakid
09-09-2008 1:49 PM


sorry nosyned
Sorry, I didn't see your post until after I replied. It won't be discussed further.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by AlphaOmegakid, posted 09-09-2008 1:49 PM AlphaOmegakid has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024