Hello Catholic Scientist and Happy New Year.
quote:
So where are these claims that the ocean crust is more than a couple hundred million years old?
You’re missing my whole point here. Weather the ocean crust is 100, 200 or 300+ million years old is not the issue I am revealing. The ”fact’ is that there is a 3+ billion year difference in age of the ocean crust vs. the continents.
quote:
There's clearly a subduction zone on the west coast of S. America.
There is? Interesting, it looks like a great big ditch to me! Where is all of the sediment buildup? There would be literally piles of . .hundreds of miles high again if you stacked it vertically over these ”millions’ of years. And look closely, this ”zone’ clearly changes shape as you go north and south doesn’t it? And there’s still a bunch of volcanoes in the western Americas, all over the place, and far removed from any subduction zones.
Take a ”looksea’ at Africa in your link. It’s surrounded by MOR’s (or MOM’s) but NO subsuction cracks! Where is all of the ”youthful’ crust going to go to get ”recycled’? Ditto between Antarctica and Africa as well as Australia.
Again, in your link take a closer look at the Filipino plate subduction zones. Interesting, it’s surrounded! Where are the MOR’s?
Furthermore, where are all of the MOM’s for the Pacific? (Oh, there’s a little strand of them west of southern Chile) . . almost 1/3rd of the face of the planet (ie the Great Pacific Blue) is a
great big giant orphan!!!
Take a closer look at the Pacific Ocean and you see a ton of volcanic islands, but no MOR’s to make new crust. Why is this? The crust had to be created somewhere to support the plate tectonic theory, but I don’t see any, or enough of them to create this huge mass of ocean floor. Just a bunch of volcanic edifices.
Subduction as well as ”sea floor spreading’ is assumed based on what scientists ”think’ they are seeing and also what they truly ”want’ to see to support the PT theory. They do not take the time to explore other mega events that could have created these oceanic ditches and ridges. They like the plate tectonic theory too much and therefore can’t let go of it due to its dominance in science. Again it does sound kinda cool and has therefore become the ”knee jerk’ solution to all geological features.
quote:
Its just old sea floor sitting there.
Yes! That’s right! It’s just ”sitting there’! Thank you! . . Oh wait, there is some movement . . ~2.5 centimeters per anno . .. hilarious.
quote:
In the link above, there is a lack of a subduction zone on the middle section of the west coast of the US.
Well, then all the volcanologists need to change their publications as all of the volcanic edifices in the Cascades are stated as being “continental margin” volcanoes, and then they show the ”classic’ subduction diagram to explain their formation. And of course as we take a look at the Pacific blue bottom in this local we see a series of canyons, faults, and more volcanoes . . no subduction bin. So what gives?
Furthermore, how in the heck does ”thin’ ocean crust subduct below a ”thick’ continental crust? Huh???
Why don’t the continents subduct? Too thick? Not worth as much ransom perhaps? The only ”subducting’ going on in the world is by the Mafia.
quote:
Whoopty do. Nobody is saying otherwise
Well the ”whoopty’ is the ”fact’ of the 3+ billion year age difference, and the ”do’ is, given this ”geological fact’, this now forces science to change gears and go into
science fiction overdrive with even deeper fictional theory like continents ”deciding’ to ”break apart’ and ”floating’ around the globe crashing and bashing into each other in dire efforts to explain this huge paradox.
Remember, science must be 1) observable 2) testable and 3) repeatable. Otherwise, it is theory and
ONLY theory and therefore
MUST remain and be dealt with strictly on a theoretical basis. Moving theory into the fact category is very risky business as well as a grave scientific sin, and it has been committed over and over in the field of earth science. You’re an engineer so you know your work must be bullet proof or else your career is on the line. Bridges and buildings are held up by good design, sound engineering, and the tested science that backs it. Geologists and earth scientists have no accountability so they can throw out whatever theory and million-billion this and that and have absolutely NO repercussions regarding their assumptions that are based on even more assumptions, and then write a book and teach college. Gee wiz its time for change. We simply cannot keep letting outlandish earth science theories muddy up the definition of true science.
Land goes UP and land comes DOWN. Simple. And yes there is some horizontal shifting at major faults . ..but no drifting, and the ocean crust does not get sucked up like a big giant Slurpee.
Again, scientists prefer to totally ignore observed and documented earth processes of how land is formed and destroyed via volcanism in preference over a poorly backed theory. This is absurd folks. Scientists have ”played’ around with plate tectonics long enough.
quote:
The oceans weren't "held up".
Of course not. This was simply my way of opening up the conversation thus exposing this huge scientific paradox. And it worked . ..Now everyone is booking down the
science fiction autobahn wide open showing Looney Tune cartoons of more wacky theory.
quote:
You have not exposed any problem with current theory.
Run the numbers for yourself and take a closer look at all of the geographical details. The plate tectonic theory utterly falls apart like a giant jig saw puzzle turned upside down. Now science has a great big ”non tectonic’ mess to clean up . . good luck.
Challenge:
If you guys are going to prove the play tectonic theory to a fussy, cranky old Architect, then please provide the following:
” Sound, tested experiments that subduction actually occurs. Preferably from Los Alamos National Laboratories or Oakridge. Real experiments please.
” Sound, tested experiments that the sea floor is actually spreading at the MOR’s. Again, please provide experimental data from a national laboratory. Annual millimeter measurement is negligible. (These features have eluded scientists for so long it’s not even funny. I have proved how these formations occurred in my own shop, and I can repeat it, over and over again.)
” Sound, tested, documented and observed data that continental drift occurred, or is still occurring. Real experiments, no cartoons. Annual centimeter measurement is negligible. Again, national laboratories please.
I will look forward to seeing some real scientific proof. If I am not convinced, then I will stamp the submitted information with a stamp I have in my office that we use for submitted data from GC’s and suppliers in order to prove to me that their materials and products meet my strict specifications. It simply says
REJECTED-RESUBMIT.
And please, come back to me with documented science and not the 'typical' evolutionist responses that can only make personal jabs. Jab the science.
Thanks
™ Version 4.2