The race issue

so, in a few short years, whites were able to successfully implement agriculture in such a harsh climatebut Aboriginals (who were the ones who taught the whites about this harsh land) could not do this in 40,000 years???thats laughable.the australian bush produces plenty of food. The aboriginals know this, they know where to find it and they know how to cook it...they did it in the past and they still do itare you saying that the aboriginals are older then the cultures from which they came are they???

i havnt changed my tune. migration has been in progress since around that time and continues today. According to one book i have, migration from mainland china to the south east asia region began at that time... im not the expert but some people claim to be and i have to take their word for it.About Mungo man, as you said, my opinion doesnt matter. But to be fair i dont hold the view that carbon dating is accurate, so instantly i would question the age they place on him.About his DNA, i have no ideas...i wouldnt even like to speculate on that one. Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

no, i dont like carbon dating because it is based on the assumption that the levels of C14 were the same in the the prehsitoric earth, as it is today
and there are many factors which can cause variances in the current levelsAlso, my problem isnt with a young earth because the bible does NOT indicate a young earth and i do not believe in the young earth theory. It indicates young HUMANS. Young humans with a written history that only goes back approximately 5000 years.

my apologies for not having a PHD

its getting slightly ridiculous dont you think? Chasing tails after semantics is a waste of bandwidth.I have not misrepresented smith. Did you or anyone else bother to read the book?perhaps you could read it yourself and let us know what it says about the Genesis legends.

i have read a lot about carbon dating thank youand from what i've read i am skeptical as to its accuracy