Note: I'm not a physicist. Wait for cavediver or Son Goku for the real deal.
Is there "space" outside of the known universe?
What's North of the North Pole?
Your question is the result of attempting to apply human experience to the Universe as a whole. "Space" is a property
of the Universe and makes sense only in the context of the Universe itself, much like the direction North makes sense only within the context of a globe.
What I mean is that, if you were to journey to the outermost edge of the known universe... the point where all matter in the universe had not expanded past yet... would there just be more empty space beyond that boundary?
Again, this question misrepresents the actual expansion of the Universe. The Universe is finite and expanding, but it has no boundary. The best available analogy would be to compare the Universe to an expanding balloon, with all three spacial dimensions represented only by the 2-D surface (ie, there is no "up"). As teh balloon expands, the space between two given points increases. The surface is finite, but it has no boundary - there is no "place where the Universe has not expanded yet."
To give you a little more background, I'm currently in a discussion with a creationist and we are discussing the nature of empty space in the Universe. He is trying to make a point that, as the universe expands, new "space" is "created" between the different stellar bodies.
It's more like the existing, finite amount of space
stretches in all directions at once, much like an expanding balloon. The farther away two points are, the more expanding space exists between them, and so the more rapidly the two points will move apart. Nothing is being "created." Further, space is a set of three dimensions - asserting that "width" can be "created" misrepresents what dimensions are.
My point is that space itself is nothing but the void... the medium (if you will) that all matter expands into. It is not tangible, but rather it is only identifiable as a lack of anything between the various stellar bodies. A true void.
There's more to it than that...but Ill leave that to cavediver and Son Goku, as I won't be able to comment on it with any degree of accuracy.
I'll say only that space is also affected by mass - mass warps space. This generates the phenomenon of gravitational lensing (and in fact all of gravity). Warped space can change the final direction of a ray traveling in a straight line without causing the ray to bend (an unbent straight bar can be made to have both ends touch, for example). There's a lot more to space than just "void."
My own problem with this understanding is perhaps due to my current understanding of the nature of the universe. I've never understood that whole "balloon" analogy with everything sitting on the surface of the balloon. Instead, I've always thought of the universe more like a "cloud" containing all matter in the known universe that is constantly expanding in all directions outward.
Your analogy is flawed because it posits that there is an "outside" to the Universe. Space, matter, energy, time, all of these are properties [i]of[/]i the Universe. There may well be additional dimensions that our Universe exists
in, much the same way the 2-D surface of the balloon or globe exists within the additional spacial and time dimensions, but "space," like "time" has no real meaning outside of the context of the Universe, in exactly the same way that "North" has no meaning outside the context of a globe.
That help at all?