Let me give you an example. I'll go back to the fossil record. If evolutionists and creationists are honest, we all know that the whole record is sparse at best and that transitional fossils do not exist.
You see, this is what I'm talking about.
Creationists need thumping huge great falsehoods like that one.
Scientists compare their predictions of the existence and nature of intermediate forms with the intermediate forms that they find in the fossil record, and they observe that their predictions are correct. This is science.
Creationists lie to you and pretend that intermediate forms don't exist, because they're too frightened and dishonest to face reality. This is not science.
You see the difference?
We don't have two views of
the same facts. We have one bunch of people acknowledging the facts and another bunch of people lying to you.
Evolutionists also agree that there are missing links, but instead of dealing with the fossil record, they have had to basically abandon their dependence upon it. They now say, in order to override the painful truth about missing links, that evolution occurs in quick sudden bursts and therefore there shouldn't be transitional fossils at all.
This is also untrue.
Before you decided to go around reciting dumb creationist lies, why didn't you find out whether or not they were true?
Now...whose allowing their worldview to get in the way of the obvious results of their findings?
The creationists who told you these dumb lies; and you for believing them without a moment's investigation.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
