Percy writes:
You still don't understand the reason that creationists proposed the vapor canopy in the first place. They knew they couldn't get flood geology into the classroom if it required miracles from God, so they proposed the vapor canopy as the source of water. The vapor canopy was proposed solely to remove God from the equation. Once you reintroduce God, which is what you're doing, then there's no longer any reason for the vapor canopy. God can do anything. God can make rain fall from an empty sky. God doesn't need a vapor canopy.
but hang on a second.
the question was asked back on page 3 'What is the water vapor' and does the bible actually mention such a water vapor.
I replied with the scriptures that mention the water vapor to show that it actually is in the bible and not a creationist invention.
This is why I speculated as to how it may have existed in the atmosphere because the bible gives no other information about it except to say that it was 'water that was above the expanse of the area where birds fly'
I asked the question...'What 'form' may the water vapor have been'? Could it have been in the form of hydrogen and oxygen (which is what water is made from) I wasnt making any claim that it was...i was asking the question.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.