Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,334 Year: 3,591/9,624 Month: 462/974 Week: 75/276 Day: 3/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Vapour canopy and fountains of the deep
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 121 of 144 (507963)
05-09-2009 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by Son
05-09-2009 7:12 AM


Re: bump for creationist contribution
yes i do understand...huntard gave a very apt description when he said that the force of energy it would create would destroy the whole earth
I understand that. But I dont think it would be impossible for God to control such a reaction in such a way that the earth would not be harmed. *please note that I was speculating on the hydrogen and oxygen post, it isnt my set belief*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Son, posted 05-09-2009 7:12 AM Son has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Percy, posted 05-09-2009 9:55 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 133 of 144 (508031)
05-10-2009 2:24 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by Huntard
05-09-2009 9:54 AM


Re: fishing for facts
Huntard writes:
The water was here all along. Does the term "ice-age" ring a bell? In case it doesn't, what do you think those massive glaciers consisted of?
but thats the problem, the areas of earth that are currently under ice were at one time warm and not covered in ice.
So where did all that water that is there now, come from?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Huntard, posted 05-09-2009 9:54 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-10-2009 2:44 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 138 by Huntard, posted 05-10-2009 4:15 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 134 of 144 (508032)
05-10-2009 2:32 AM
Reply to: Message 125 by Percy
05-09-2009 9:55 AM


Re: bump for creationist contribution
Percy writes:
You still don't understand the reason that creationists proposed the vapor canopy in the first place. They knew they couldn't get flood geology into the classroom if it required miracles from God, so they proposed the vapor canopy as the source of water. The vapor canopy was proposed solely to remove God from the equation. Once you reintroduce God, which is what you're doing, then there's no longer any reason for the vapor canopy. God can do anything. God can make rain fall from an empty sky. God doesn't need a vapor canopy.
but hang on a second.
the question was asked back on page 3 'What is the water vapor' and does the bible actually mention such a water vapor.
I replied with the scriptures that mention the water vapor to show that it actually is in the bible and not a creationist invention.
This is why I speculated as to how it may have existed in the atmosphere because the bible gives no other information about it except to say that it was 'water that was above the expanse of the area where birds fly'
I asked the question...'What 'form' may the water vapor have been'? Could it have been in the form of hydrogen and oxygen (which is what water is made from) I wasnt making any claim that it was...i was asking the question.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by Percy, posted 05-09-2009 9:55 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-10-2009 2:45 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 139 by Percy, posted 05-10-2009 6:10 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 143 by bluescat48, posted 05-11-2009 12:05 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 135 of 144 (508034)
05-10-2009 2:42 AM
Reply to: Message 132 by anglagard
05-10-2009 1:31 AM


Re: Peg Wins (but what is the prize?)
anglagard writes:
I will leave the evidently hopeless job of trying to educate you or to get you to admit it when you are wrong to those more patient and kind than I am in this matter.
good idea.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by anglagard, posted 05-10-2009 1:31 AM anglagard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024