Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,797 Year: 4,054/9,624 Month: 925/974 Week: 252/286 Day: 13/46 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YEC without the bible, possible?
BobAliceEve
Member (Idle past 5422 days)
Posts: 107
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Joined: 02-03-2004


Message 44 of 133 (510396)
05-30-2009 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Meldinoor
05-29-2009 1:20 AM


Re: Interesting and why
The question that must be asked is "Were Adam and Eve created immortal, innocent, and accountable?" No other question matters.
If evolution occurred then there is no "first man and first woman, immortal, innocent, and accountable". I think we can agree that no animal created by evolution is immortal. The inability of an animal to sin is never (to my knowledge) questioned. The Bible says that Adam and Eve disobeyed God and were therefor driven from the garden. If their ape parents did the same act but were not driven from God's presence then how can the change of a few genes reconcile the unfairness of that? Our genes are significantly different than Adam and Eve's - are we more accountable or less?
Only if Adam and Eve were created immortal, innocent, and accountable did the fall occur. Only because of the fall was a Savior and Redeemer necessary. A Redeemer to recover from the resulting separation from God and a Savior to recover from the resulting loss of immortality.
The physical age of the earth has nothing to do with the question. However, accepting the creation and fall as fact seems lead one to accepting the Bible as fact. Accepting the Bible as fact can lead to several conclusions, one of which is YEC.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Meldinoor, posted 05-29-2009 1:20 AM Meldinoor has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Meldinoor, posted 05-31-2009 12:40 AM BobAliceEve has replied

  
BobAliceEve
Member (Idle past 5422 days)
Posts: 107
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Joined: 02-03-2004


Message 49 of 133 (510452)
05-31-2009 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Meldinoor
05-31-2009 12:40 AM


quote:
I don't see why YEC is a necessary conclusion to reach, even if you just look at scripture.
I did not say it was a necessary or a valid conclusion. I don't believe it in the exact way that many do.
I believe that God created Adam and Eve (immortal, guiltless, and accountable (i.e, with a soul)) and that they eventually transgressed a law of God, were held accountable and eventually died both spiritually and physically. We can come back to the immortal later if that is desired.
I also believe that God organized the Earth from very old material. I have seen what I believe the correct translation of the Hebrew to be organized instead.
However, I do believe that the Earth as an entity is young. I have demonstrated elsewhere here that the atmosphere of the Earth is around 13,600 years old. So, I am a young Earth (i.e, a usable entity) organized and not a young earth (a materially existent) creationist.
A pleasure always to talk with you.
Edited by BobAliceEve, : Changed "young Earth creationist" to "young Earth organized".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Meldinoor, posted 05-31-2009 12:40 AM Meldinoor has not replied

  
BobAliceEve
Member (Idle past 5422 days)
Posts: 107
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Joined: 02-03-2004


Message 56 of 133 (510511)
05-31-2009 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Son
05-31-2009 10:12 AM


Re: OEC without science?
You did not ask me either but I would like to expand the question:
Would old earth or young earth be the perceived duration by:
- Adam and Eve post exit from the Garden of Eden
- Noah at the flood
- Moses while receiving Genesis by revelation
- Jesus at the end of the Old Testament time
The even better question is always, would these people tell you that Adam and Eve were created by God. The age of the earth does not matter if the creation happened.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Son, posted 05-31-2009 10:12 AM Son has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Meldinoor, posted 05-31-2009 11:32 PM BobAliceEve has replied

  
BobAliceEve
Member (Idle past 5422 days)
Posts: 107
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Joined: 02-03-2004


Message 66 of 133 (510709)
06-02-2009 9:52 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Meldinoor
05-31-2009 11:32 PM


Re: OEC without science?
If I might ask a few questions to gain a better understanding of your thinking:
1) How did God select Adam and Eve to place in the garden?
2) What, generally or precisely, is the soul you mentioned earlier?
3) What do you understand to be the purpose for God's starting the human family?
4) Are we humans aware of our soul?
5) Can God communicate with us?
Your answers will help me formulate better questions regarding the five people I mentioned in the message you quoted.
Thank you in advance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Meldinoor, posted 05-31-2009 11:32 PM Meldinoor has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Meldinoor, posted 06-03-2009 1:14 AM BobAliceEve has replied

  
BobAliceEve
Member (Idle past 5422 days)
Posts: 107
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Joined: 02-03-2004


Message 95 of 133 (511187)
06-07-2009 2:39 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Meldinoor
06-03-2009 1:14 AM


Re: OEC without science?
I thank you for your marvelous patience. I have collected our several exchanges following. I have replied to various sub-sections with a conclusion at the bottom
BobAliceEve writes:
Message 47
You did not ask me either but I would like to expand the question:
Would old earth or young earth be the perceived duration by:
- Adam and Eve post exit from the Garden of Eden
- Noah at the flood
- Moses while receiving Genesis by revelation

- Jesus at the end of the Old Testament time
- (in addition to the people of Middle Ages in Message 46)
The even better question is always, would these people tell you that Adam and Eve were created by God? The age of the earth does not matter if the Creation happened.
Meldinoor writes:
Four of the five people mentioned were mere mortals. There is no way to answer this question, and neither do we have reason to believe that they knew any better than we do (except Jesus, who may have been omniscient). In the hypothetical situation where YEC is correct, Adam and Eve may have known, but since evidence suggests that Adam and Eve evolved, I'd venture a guess that they wouldn't have known the subtleties of their own creation.
Possibly, there is a way to answer the question. Item 5 below may hold a clue?
Meldinoor writes:
I admit these are challenging questions. I'm not a biblical scholar, and I'm certainly not God, so I will only offer my rather limited guesses at your questions. I'm not sure how they pertain to this thread, but I have a feeling that you'll be able to connect it in some way. So here goes:
BobAliceEve writes:
1) How did God select Adam and Eve to place in the garden?
Melendor writes:
Ask God. Maybe Adam and Eve were the first humans to be given souls (although, if they lived 6000yrs ago, I think that's unlikely). The garden may have been metaphorical, as may Adam and Eve.
Ask God. is a wonderful answer. Of course people can’t both live 6000 years ago and be metaphorical. Since there had to be first humans (which we both equate with having souls) are you willing to let Adam and Eve stand in for them independent of your concern about the 6000 years? Are you willing to let the 6000 years be, for now, metaphorical and the people be the real part of the Bible account.
BobAliceEve writes:
2) What, generally or precisely, is the soul you mentioned earlier?
Meldinoor writes:
The soul is whatever part of you that carries on to the afterlife. Since emotion, memory, personality etc can be explained through physical processes, I'm not sure what that leaves. Some sort of consciousness presumably. If you know anyone who's had a near-death experience, they can probably guess better than I can.
Beasts too are conscious (see your answer to 4).
BobAliceEve writes:
3) What do you understand to be the purpose for God's starting the human family?
Meldinoor writes:
To set an example for how God wanted families to be, presumably.
I think your answer is right on point.
BobAliceEve writes:
4) Are we humans aware of our soul?
Meldinoor writes:
Are you? I don't go around thinking about my soul all the time. Humans are self-aware, but so are chimps, dolphins and elephants, so I don't think that has anything to do with it. I don't even know what a soul is, except that it must be some sort of spiritual component to a person's being. I'll leave it at that.
Yes, I am aware of my soul and I do think of my accountability daily. And it seems that you are correct in saying it is some sort of spiritual component to a person’s being (from 4 above). It seems to be the part of us that goes to the afterlife (from 2). The part that is accountable to God Message 45 and Message 49 (keep in mind the question about immortal beings).
BobAliceEve writes:
5) Can God communicate with us?
Meldinoor writes:
He does in the Bible many times. He even takes on human form in the New Testament. A lot of people claim to communicate with God on a personal level. I believe God communicates with me, through the world, through His book, and even at a personal level at times.
I have faith in the messages the Bible conveys. I don't treat it as a science book, certainly not the first chapters of Genesis, which to me, reads like allegory. As long as you take this approach you don't need to struggle to fit observational evidence with the Bible.
Allegory is good. God’s communicating with us is good. Deciding what parts of the Biblical account are allegory and what parts are real (His communicating with us) is difficult for an outsider who has not had your (and my) experience of personal communication with God. We know what we know.
Meldinoor writes:
I'm curious to see where you're going with these questions.
Conclusion:
Moses was able to record the account of the Creation some 800 years after it happened by communication from God. Moses knew what he knew. So if the creation account is allegory then why would Moses bother to provide the detail of Eve not being created at the same time that Adam was created (Gen 2:18-22)?
If Adam and Eve were not immortal then why would God warn them about death. If they were not intended to be be eventually restored to immortality why would God separate them from the tree of life (the antidote to the fall, see Gen 2:22-24) so they could not "live forever" as each "put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life" which they could have eventually done if they had stayed in the garden?
All the people listed are aware of their relationship with and accountability to God. Due to the structure of the creation account they also knew that they were created and that they were created immortal. Adam and Eve knew it, Moses knew it, Jesus knew it. Noah knew. I know it.
It is my thinking that all animals with souls can too if it is important to them and if they "Ask God". Suddenly, the age of the Earth is only a distraction to the true message of living together forever as families. What are your thoughts?
Again, I express my appreciation for your patience.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Meldinoor, posted 06-03-2009 1:14 AM Meldinoor has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Meldinoor, posted 06-10-2009 3:29 AM BobAliceEve has replied

  
BobAliceEve
Member (Idle past 5422 days)
Posts: 107
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Joined: 02-03-2004


Message 120 of 133 (512739)
06-20-2009 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by Meldinoor
06-10-2009 3:29 AM


Some help from Admin please
Can a discussion be spun off from here so as to not disturb this one? The question main question is:
Meldinoor writes:
Be careful to distinguish between "your thinking" and established scriptural and scientific support.
I am not, for this discussion, concerned about scientific support but I wonder what the prevailing thinking (i.e, established scriptural support) here is on the following:
- did Adam and Eve evolve or were they created
- when God took them into the garden were they a basic family
- if created, were they subject to physical death
- was the tree of life not mentioned as a concern along with the tree of knowledge of good and evil because it was not a concern because they were already immortal
- is the tree of life the antidote to either the physical or spiritual death
- if they were a basic family and not subject to death would they live forever as a family
- is the Messiah's mission to restore to it's original state what God created or to change things
- when Isaiah says that the lion will eat hay like the ox will that be a restoration of what was before the fall or will that be a change
- is this knowledge valuable to a discussion regarding how the age of the earth is thought of
A few more answers may pop up but this would be my starting point.
Thank you,
BobAliceEve

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by Meldinoor, posted 06-10-2009 3:29 AM Meldinoor has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 06-25-2009 8:43 PM BobAliceEve has not replied
 Message 122 by ICANT, posted 06-26-2009 1:28 AM BobAliceEve has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024