Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 64/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YEC without the bible, possible?
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2128 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 23 of 133 (509956)
05-26-2009 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Minority Report
05-26-2009 9:09 AM


Re: RE - YEC without Bible?
In order to accept the young earth idea you have to reject virtually all of science.
But many creationists or YECs whom I have debated on these forums insist that they are not anti-science!
YEC without Bible? Here's the test: do scientists or informed laymen in non-Christian countries come up with a young earth scenario from the scientific evidence? The answer is a universal no!
Young earth is strictly a religious belief, and it requires that one ignores reality.
But I have found that YECs are particularly adept at that. They manage to ignore, self-delude, misrepresent, or in some other way dispose of any pesky facts that intrude upon their religious beliefs.
And unfortunately, some take this anti-science belief to an extreme:
I’m saying that evolution is not science and is of Satan. Source

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Minority Report, posted 05-26-2009 9:09 AM Minority Report has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2128 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 50 of 133 (510453)
05-31-2009 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Minority Report
05-31-2009 11:05 AM


YEC without the bible
The scientific method is an excellent way of discovering how this world works, but it is limited to this. It should not be presented as the ultimate infallible method to discover all truth.
So you are going to disparage the scientific method as "insufficient" and come up with evidence for YEC without the bible.
You can have...
...magic, superstition, wishful thinking, old wives tales, folklore, what the stars foretell and what the neighbors think, faked moon landings, omens, public opinion, astromancy, spells, Ouija boards, anecdotes, a flat or hollow earth, Da Vinci codes, tarot cards, sorcery, seances, sore bunions, black cats, divine revelation, crop circles, table tipping, witch doctors, crystals and crystal balls, numerology, divination, geocentrism, faith healing, miracles, palm reading, the unguessable verdict of history, televangelists, magic tea leaves, new age mumbo-jumbo, hoodoo, voodoo and all that other weird stuff.
Without the scientific method that's the kind of nonsense you're left with.
Thanks. I'll stick with the scientific method.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Minority Report, posted 05-31-2009 11:05 AM Minority Report has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2128 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 97 of 133 (511199)
06-07-2009 8:43 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by Minority Report
06-07-2009 7:59 PM


Re: Is Genesis metaphoric or off topic?
I was arguing against Genesis being metaphorical, and therefore that the Bible really does imply YEC, so it is still on topic mostly. But I have asked Meldinoor if we need to open new thread to discuss this aspect in more detail.
Perhapps I should have said 'Adam & Eve were originally intended to live forever.' I was including the tree of life with Adam & Eve's creation, so in that context they were created to live forever. Genesis 3:22 does indicate that they could not live forever independant from God and/or the tree of life, which is what I had already indicated in the post.
It would seem that the details of one's religious belief would be off topic.
The topic could probably be summarized as "does scientific evidence point to a young earth--without reference to the bible."
The answer can only be "No." Belief in a young earth is a religious belief not supported by scientific evidence, in spite of the distortions, misrepresentations, and outright lies that creation "scientists" come up with to try and force science to support their belief.
We have the 101 evidences for a young earth on another thread. Those "evidences" are not faring too well.
To stay on topic, perhaps you could address how one would come to believe in a young earth without the bible or other religious belief? Information concerning scientists in non-Christian countries, and of other faiths, who suddenly--without converting to Christianity--come up with evidence for a young earth would be appropriate to present here.
Any such evidence that you know of?

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Minority Report, posted 06-07-2009 7:59 PM Minority Report has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2128 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 111 of 133 (511508)
06-10-2009 3:22 AM


Case proven
To return to the topic:
Given the number of posts referencing the bible, is there any doubt that the YEC belief comes from that source?

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Meldinoor, posted 06-10-2009 3:31 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2128 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 117 of 133 (512089)
06-14-2009 5:49 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by Minority Report
06-14-2009 5:39 AM


Re: YEC
I felt that this groundwork needed to be laid first before introducing evidence for YEC.
The "evidence" for YEC has been examined by science and has been found to be nonexistent.
Only those with an a priori belief in a particular interpretation of the bible support YEC. Without that a priori belief, nobody comes up with the young earth idea based on scientific evidence.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Minority Report, posted 06-14-2009 5:39 AM Minority Report has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024