Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   An accurate analogy of Evolution by Natural selection
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 3 of 49 (511762)
06-11-2009 5:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by slevesque
06-11-2009 5:02 PM


There's a fundamental flaw in your analogy; in tape copying the best end point is defined as the starting point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by slevesque, posted 06-11-2009 5:02 PM slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by slevesque, posted 06-13-2009 12:51 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 8 of 49 (511816)
06-12-2009 4:16 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by slevesque
06-11-2009 5:02 PM


Darwin: the original and the best
It occurs to me that the best analogy remains the one that Darwin himself used: domestication and artificial selection.
Edited by Mr Jack, : Added subtitle

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by slevesque, posted 06-11-2009 5:02 PM slevesque has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 44 of 49 (512204)
06-15-2009 8:45 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by slevesque
06-14-2009 6:53 AM


What does it mean to be unchanged?
Unchanged in what sense?
Consider the extant species of King Crab; morphologically they're very similar but genetically they're wildly different - as different as any other two species that diverged as far back. Morphological stasis does not mean that species have remained unchanged only that whatever change has occurred cannot be deduced from the fossil record.
This should not be surprising for two reasons. Firstly, studies on microbes have found that where a gene's function is inhibited by a mutation it is most often not restored by reversing that change but by a new mutation - at a different location - that suppresses the first change. Secondly, much of what goes on in an organism is simply not fossilisable: your immune system, the connections in your brain, the details of your metabolism, the tuning of your digestive system, the list goes on and on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by slevesque, posted 06-14-2009 6:53 AM slevesque has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024