Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Healthcare In The USA
Straggler
Member (Idle past 91 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 1 of 72 (519434)
08-13-2009 4:28 PM


Can anyone explain to me the situation with the current healthcare bill in the US?
My source of US news is all too often "The Daily Show" with Jon Stewart (and even he doesn't pretend that this is news as such ). My last viewing portrayed a series of irate and incredibly aggressive confrontations in local town halls with anti-healthcare members of the public denouncing Obama as a communist Arab selling America to the devil.
So what is going on? Who is pro? Who is against? What are the facts? What are the fictions?
As a confused foreigner I want to know the "truth"........Please enlighten me.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Stile, posted 08-13-2009 4:49 PM Straggler has replied
 Message 5 by ooh-child, posted 08-13-2009 5:39 PM Straggler has replied
 Message 7 by Taz, posted 08-13-2009 6:12 PM Straggler has replied
 Message 10 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-13-2009 6:57 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 22 by onifre, posted 08-14-2009 6:50 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 26 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-14-2009 10:10 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 33 by Kitsune, posted 08-16-2009 3:40 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 91 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 3 of 72 (519439)
08-13-2009 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Stile
08-13-2009 4:49 PM


Re: The Basics
Cheers for your "kick start" post on US healthcare Stile.
And can I just say as an aside that you have been rockin in the various evidence/atheist/faith/delusion threads recently. My guess is that you have been thinking through your position in these areas quite avidly lately. [/end butt licking]
Anyway back to healthcare.........

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Stile, posted 08-13-2009 4:49 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Stile, posted 08-13-2009 5:00 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 91 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 8 of 72 (519447)
08-13-2009 6:18 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Taz
08-13-2009 6:12 PM


So.....
Is the bill going to go through?
Or has the hysteria and propaganda effectively worked?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Taz, posted 08-13-2009 6:12 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Rahvin, posted 08-13-2009 7:07 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 13 by Taz, posted 08-13-2009 10:24 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 91 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 15 of 72 (519490)
08-14-2009 6:48 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by ooh-child
08-13-2009 5:39 PM


Welcome....
Well, I guess I'll take this opportunity to submit my first post here. Hello all!
Hello to you too. Despite starting this topic I intend to take a bit of a backseat and just see what others have to say on the matter.
However given that your first post here was a reply to my OP I felt compelled to at least say "Hi" back. Welcome!!
Let me know if I can offer any other insight for you, Straggler.
I am going to see what others have to say first. But knowing myself I am sure I will be unable to resist chucking in my own twopenneth and asking a load of questions at some point.
Stay Happy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by ooh-child, posted 08-13-2009 5:39 PM ooh-child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by ooh-child, posted 08-14-2009 11:32 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 91 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 57 of 72 (520163)
08-19-2009 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by onifre
08-19-2009 4:39 PM


Re: Healthcare Reform is Dead
So, Straggler, I now have a question... do you still disagree?
Definitely less than I did. I certainly don't have an equally supported position in terms of references. But I have just looked at this thread and will think on it some more before getting back properly.
One question - What did other industries want? The insurance industry for example? Are all big business winners in this or are some industries pissed off at this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by onifre, posted 08-19-2009 4:39 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by onifre, posted 08-19-2009 6:29 PM Straggler has replied
 Message 60 by dronestar, posted 08-20-2009 9:18 AM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 91 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 61 of 72 (520316)
08-20-2009 6:33 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by dronestar
08-20-2009 9:18 AM


Re: Healthcare Reform is Dead
Dronester writes:
Err Straggler, I think you may still be missing my main point: the public's interest/needs came last, AFTER all/some/ANY big business.
Err Dronester I think you'll find that I have already agreed to that far more than you are giving me credit for. See below:
Straggler writes:
Now I cynically predict that the industry with the most cash will ulimately "win". Most likely in the form of a bill so watered down that it will have little effect on reduced dirty energy use in terms of green tax incentives or meaningful carbon reduction targets.
Media manipulation? Certainly.
Big Business lobbying for it's own financial gain? Certainly
Eventual outcome decided largely on the basis of the above? Very probably.
But the fact that there are these dispirate interests, the fact that the competing industries are having to spend vast sums of money on PR, the fact that the opinions of the masses matter enough to require such money to be spent on PR, the fact that the government is attempting to get this through and may even yet do so in some form that has some negative effect on even the powerful and wealthy energy industry.......
All of this suggests to me that an elite few representatives of "big business" cannot be deciding elections, governments and key policies from behind the scenes because there is no such thing as "big business" in terms of united common interests on such things.
Essentially it is all much too dispirate and competetive to be anything other than largely reactive and unplanned. Which, thankfully, means that the voting public do still get to have some small say in matters. Even if it is on the basis of largely biased infomation and even if it is only once every few years.
Message 148
We are all card carrying members of the aluminium hat brigade here!! The only question is how big are our respective hats?
Anyway see my next post to Oni for complete ass open surrender. Feel free to join the queue to take your pleasure once Oni has finished with me.
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by dronestar, posted 08-20-2009 9:18 AM dronestar has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 91 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 62 of 72 (520319)
08-20-2009 6:50 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by onifre
08-19-2009 6:29 PM


Take Me Big Boy
Wotcha Oni
I am going to concede, surrender even, this one without a fight. I did start writing about dispirate interests blah blah blah....... But ultimately I have nothing with which to dispute the references you have presented.
I remain of the opinion that some of you more extreme suggestions (that the civil rights movement was orchestrated by big business, that PR presidents are identified, groomed and maneuvred years in advance of elections etc. etc.) are worthy of at least a thin covering of baking foil around the ears. Even if not the full on aluminium saucepan headgear that I previously asserted.
Can I defend these opinions? Well a small part of me is tempted to take on the intellectual challenge of pitting myself against your obviously superior knowledge in these areas. I have enough humility to have little doubt you will ravage such arguments. But equally I have enough arrogance that I reckon I could at least make you fight hard for your victory.
However a larger part of me is intent on some respite from heavy debate and conflict. I would much rather currently spend some time blathering pointlessly about beer, cricket (which started again today - I am sure you will be excited to hear) and other things which nobody here gives a monkeys testicle about. Or even reads (some of my more inebriated posts I certainly hope not anyway).
So if you want to go for the kill I am standing here bent over with my pants around my ankles........
All I ask is that you be gentle with me.
[ABE] Btw, take your time responding. I just noticed the complaint thread, which I actually didn't know there was one, and you seem to be public enemy number one.
All part of the fun. Apparently
When you gets over the bitching from those with thin skin, I'll see you here for some old school fist-to-cuffs... no gloves!
If you can't get anyone else to take you on with regard to this stuff and are determined to have a full on victory over somebody give me a week or two and I'll reconsider. Like I say I am arrogant enough to think I could make you work for it. Just more interested in following the cricket and less time consuming EvC stuff at the mo.
Where is Keresu these days BTW? I miss his shaggy blonde locks.
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by onifre, posted 08-19-2009 6:29 PM onifre has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 91 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 67 of 72 (520416)
08-21-2009 12:24 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Legend
08-21-2009 7:34 AM


Proportion of GDP - Health Specifically
Overall tax burden does not necessarily reflect spending on healthcare specifically.
that's interesting, rumour has it that we're one of the most taxed people in the world but it's useful to see some figures for other countries.
I did a search on google for - healthcare costs US NHS GDP. And got the following as the first entry. I am not claiming it is as independent source but are the figures accurate?
It was my understanding (which is of course why I did that search) that US healthcare cost more than ours in one sense or another.
The cost of healthcare systems varies dramatically between countries. In America it is by far the highest - 16% of US GDP, totalling over $2 trillion a year. In the EU the relative cost as a proportion of GDP is half that. In France and Germany it is 9%, and in the UK rather less at 8%. These variations matter hugely since in the UK each extra 1% of GDP wpuld add 15bn to the health budget. The first point therefore is that on any count the NHS scores highly on value for money. The US healthcare system is relative to GDP twice as expensive as the NHS, yet nobody could claim that it was twice as good - indeed in a number of respects it is clearly worse.
Account Suspended
So are these figures accurate and if they are what do they tell us about the relative costs of the two systems?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Legend, posted 08-21-2009 7:34 AM Legend has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024