Why are there no human apes alive today?

It's very simple really. It's because they weren't adapted to their changing environment, while the other apes and we were.

---

I hunt for the truth

RAZD is hardly a flamer, he's one of the best posters we have here, and you can learn alot from him. No one. However, those that reject evolution often are. Strange that science doesn't agree with you, no? That's not how species are indexed in biology. Don't use "lol" please, it gives off the impression that you're not taking this seriously and just want to act like some clown. Further, he wasn't flaming. Well, evolution is a part of science, and those that are against evolution often are, even though they reap the benefits of it in their everyday life.

---

I hunt for the truth

There's no timelimit, post when you can. But please, make sure it's a quality post. That's still wrong. I think you mean Australopithecus. I appreciate that English is not your first language, but misspellings like these are really unnecessary, not to mention of course that it's Latin and not English, but still.Oh, and what's wrong with the perfectly fine intermediate fossils of the Australopithecus? Very good, and very mature of you to admit mistakes. This shows you are willing to learn. We're here to help, if there's anything that's not clear, feel free to ask. Do you really mean that? Because I'm not sure if there is a hint of sarcasm in there. You can choose to no longer reply to this thread, but threads are generally only closed if they reach somewhere around the 300 post mark, or if they're going completely off-topic. In the latter case they can usually be requested to be reopened after a few days. That's your choice, but there's a lot to learn here besides religion.

---

I hunt for the truth

Then how come virtually everything you say about it is wrong? But it's not even an explanation. "Goddidit" is the same as "we don't know, and never will". Another lie? This is why we say you are ignorant of evolution. So...now they DO happen...yet are "breaking the gene up". Make up your mind, either they are or they aren't happening. If you really knew about evolution, you wouldn't be saying these things.

---

I hunt for the truth

... Because those apes were adapted to their (ever changing) environment, yet those apemen weren't. It's really that simple.

---

I hunt for the truth

Original sources please? This seems very much like a creationist quotemine. Which has absolutely nothing to do with evolution. They show both. Fully formed animals that showcase progressive changes. Yes, this is why we have this evidence. It's called the fossil record. Only in creationist circles.

---

I hunt for the truth

Wells is lying. Pray tell, who are these "many" you refer to?

---

I hunt for the truth

Yes, let's assert all around. You studied biology and therefore know that wells is telling the truth? I'd like some evidence for that claim. So, there aren't any. Lying is frowned upon, you know. Or, if you're not lying, provide the names of the many biologists who disagree. I'm hardly in a position to deny a list of say...10.000 biologists who agree with Wells (yes, that would constitute many. Not 100, not 200, not 500. Do you have any idea how many biologists there are, anyway?)

---

I hunt for the truthI am the one Orgasmatron
The outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony
My servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant
Clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery
Of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount
Paranoia the law
My name is called religion
Sadistic, sacred whore.
-Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead

I asked if you had studied it. That doesn't mean you know some biology. That means you have spent several years really studying the subject. Your other comments here make me think that was not the case. I appreciate English is not your first language, but what are you talking about here? There is no way for simple water molecules to ever form a nice ordered and precise snowflake, it's just blind material. God must make every little snowflake himself. "Common sense" eh? So, the literal hundreds of thousands of studies into the subject are wrong, yet your "common sense" has cleared the matter in mere minutes. I'm sorry if I don't nominate you for the nobel price yet.

---

I hunt for the truthI am the one Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony, ,y servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law
My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore.
-Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead

Evidence? What evidence? He had (false) critiques of evolution. This is not evidence for creation. Since his ideas were wrong, he was indeed easily dismissed by the actual evidence. A genetic falacy? Surely you mean logical falacy? I know English is not your first language, but still. No he doesn't. He presents false ideas and logical falacies and hopes readers don't know enough about evolution to buy into his lies. What? Please be a bit more specific.

---

I hunt for the truthI am the one Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony, my servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law
My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore.
-Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead

Ah... My apologies then. Uhm no. As you can see below my avatar, I'm from The Netherlands, I would like to think of English as my "second language" though. I don't know every little word form every little discipline, however.But thanks for pointing out my error.

---

I hunt for the truthI am the one Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony, my servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law
My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore.
-Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead

Evolution. Or, they possessed traits others didn't, which were beneficial. No, if others were overly complex, they could die out because the environment changed and they were too specialised to adapt. No it doesn't. Because they weren't adapted well enough to their (ever changing) environment...

---

I hunt for the truthI am the one Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony, my servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law
My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore.
-Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead

Oh, not at all. I appreciate being pointed out where I am wrong, how else am I to find new knowledge. And you are right, someone going off about somebody else being wrong, while being wrong themselves should be corrected.

---

I hunt for the truthI am the one Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony, my servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law
My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore.
-Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead

What has this got to do with math? We're talking biology here. No they don't. They're not creationists. He was rebutted easily and immediately with real verifiable evidence. Yes, you were right, I appologize. I didn't know the word "genetic falacy". Still, he was debunked by actual evidence.

---

I hunt for the truthI am the one Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony, my servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law
My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore.
-Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead

You do know that lions don't live in deserts, but in savannah grasslands, yes? (just checking )