If 'nature did it' is an error and that 'God did it' is an error, then what options are left? Please explain.
The truth is left to be found in that case.
What you are doing is setting up a false dichotomy, where you attempt to show that nature cannot create such and such protein, and blah blah, so therefore it had to have supernatural origins. BUT you have yet to show the supernatural origins.
I have no problem with you proving that nature can't create what you claim in your OP. But I will not accept your unproven alternative (poof) as the default answer.
Why don't you try being honest with those with whom you differ with? I didn't 'hand wave' away anything so frivolously as you suggest.
Sure looked like it to me. Your whole argument reeks of personal incredulity. You haven't actually shown why nature could NOT do what you say it can't. You just don't see how, which means very little in proving that it can't.
I did a lot of reading and research on this subject and I've done a lot more since I tossed out evolution.
And what did you find? My guess is not very much, because this sort of thing is still in it's infancy. Science will always need to answer questions about any particular theory. Throwing out a scientific theory because new questions are flowing in and have yet to be fully answered, is anti-science, unintelligent and wholly ignorant. just my opinion, you don't have to like it.
Reasoning like yours just makes that decision that much stronger.
What reasoning? Letting science answer science questions?
Now, tell the readers why 'poof' is not scientific. Do it by empirical investigation.
Really? More dishonesty to bamboozle the masses?
For the same reason astrology is not scientific.
Explain why all the hundreds of examples living fossils (fast growing toward thousands) is not evidence against biological evolution
I read your other thread on this and it made me chuckle. Although this is off topic I'll reply anyway.
Living fossils are a prediction of the ToE. The prediction being, we should see little change in the fossil ancestors of living species that have gone through very little or no change in environment. And guess what? WE DO. Just another confirmed prediction of the ToE.
Now. If you want this argument to work, go and find a living species with ancestors that lived in a vastly different environment, and show little to no change. Run along.