Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,870 Year: 4,127/9,624 Month: 998/974 Week: 325/286 Day: 46/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Species/Kinds (for Peg...and others)
caffeine
Member (Idle past 1052 days)
Posts: 1800
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008


Message 13 of 425 (539479)
12-16-2009 6:56 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Peg
12-16-2009 6:19 AM


Re: One little detail
Cheetahs can crossbreed with neither lions nor domestic cats, however, so there must be more than one kind of wild cat, under this definition.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Peg, posted 12-16-2009 6:19 AM Peg has not replied

  
caffeine
Member (Idle past 1052 days)
Posts: 1800
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008


Message 124 of 425 (540103)
12-22-2009 7:45 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by bluescat48
12-20-2009 11:24 AM


MItochondrial Eve nitpick
Except that Mitochondial Eve was not the earliest, female ancestor, just the most recent, common female ancestor.
Mitochandrial Eve is not the most recent, common female ancestor. Y-chromosone Adam's mother, by necessity, must be a more recent common female ancestor. Eve is the most recent common matrilineal ancestor, meaning that she is everyone's mother's mother's mother's mother's mother's.... etc. There are plenty more female common ancestors who lived far more recently, but to get from each of these to every person living today, it would be necessary to trace at least one line through at least one man.
Edited by caffeine, : Just noticed the quote tags were a mess

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by bluescat48, posted 12-20-2009 11:24 AM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Dr Jack, posted 12-22-2009 7:57 AM caffeine has not replied

  
caffeine
Member (Idle past 1052 days)
Posts: 1800
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008


Message 129 of 425 (540362)
12-24-2009 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by ICANT
12-20-2009 3:02 AM


Re: Kind
For thousands of years there was no problem with what a kind was. Now all of a sudden it is a big problem.
If it is a dog it is a dog kind.
If it is a wolf it is a wolf kind.
If it is a tiger it is a tiger kind....
There is a big problem with defining kinds this way, just by using their common names. Based on the common names of animals I was brought up with, there would be a rabbit kind and a hare kind. I had great difficulty explaining what a hare was to my Czech colleague however, as they don't have separate words for rabbit and hare. Is there a hare kind and a rabbit kind in Britain, but only a rabbit kind in Czech Republic?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by ICANT, posted 12-20-2009 3:02 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by ICANT, posted 12-25-2009 9:50 AM caffeine has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024