I suggest you look the whole page over and go at countering specific problems you may see in it.
Suggest away. That's not how a debate works. If the fundamentalist who wrote that wishes to show up and debate it, fine, but I'm not going to debate something you don't even bother to fact check. The paragraphs you quoted were garbage. It has been explained to you at length more then once exactly why it is garbage. Coyote has just explained again exactly why it is garbage. Could you at least do the honorable thing and explain to Coyote why he's having his peculiar delusion of accuracy for radiocarbon dating. Maybe give the poor man's family a momentary brake from his constant, domestic
14C rants.
You say you're trying to learn. What is it you're trying to learn, Buz: How to be impervious to facts?
Say what, bud?
It's working for me today. Last night I was being redirected to a google page suggesting individual NDT essays. How long does it take you to find these misstatement hidden away in obscure sources? Why would you go to a tertiary source for your information when there are easily located, reputable, primary and secondary sources? Hope you slept well.
(Buz a liar? Et tu Brute'? Why is it that everyone makes mistakes but Buz never makes mistakes? Buz always lies? That's been bugging me here for 7 years now. )
I'm afraid you keep earning it for yourself, Buz. We all make mistakes. You more then most. But using arguments you know or should know to be false and only don't to an ascendant chorus of Fa-la-la's is lying.
Edited by lyx2no, : Punc.
You are now a million miles away from where you were in space-time when you started reading this sentence.