Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
11 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,462 Year: 3,719/9,624 Month: 590/974 Week: 203/276 Day: 43/34 Hour: 6/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gender and Humor
Jumped Up Chimpanzee
Member (Idle past 4964 days)
Posts: 572
From: UK
Joined: 10-22-2009


Message 136 of 269 (558867)
05-05-2010 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by onifre
05-05-2010 10:06 AM


And except for Silverman, the rest are NOT funny. Their stand up, not them specifically. Poundstone blows, Griffin should be shot, Sykes buys material...
Just for a second there I thought you were talking about Eric Sykes. Surely not...?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by onifre, posted 05-05-2010 10:06 AM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by onifre, posted 05-05-2010 10:26 AM Jumped Up Chimpanzee has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 137 of 269 (558870)
05-05-2010 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee
05-05-2010 10:20 AM


Just for a second there I thought you were talking about Eric Sykes. Surely not...?
No, Wanda Sykes. Black female comic.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee, posted 05-05-2010 10:20 AM Jumped Up Chimpanzee has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee, posted 05-05-2010 12:22 PM onifre has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


(1)
Message 138 of 269 (558871)
05-05-2010 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 134 by onifre
05-05-2010 9:54 AM


Re: A Poor Joke
Sorry everyone.........
It seems that by the general consensus of this thread I am a woman. Comedically at least.
I won't be giving up the day job.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by onifre, posted 05-05-2010 9:54 AM onifre has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 10:37 AM Straggler has replied

  
aiki
Member (Idle past 4314 days)
Posts: 43
Joined: 04-28-2010


Message 139 of 269 (558873)
05-05-2010 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by Modulous
05-05-2010 6:47 AM


Re: Has Hitchens not been brought up yet?
Hitch suggests in a casual fashion, a possible evolutionary explanation. He suggests that women are more prone to finding men more attractive if they are funny that men are prone to finding a woman more attractive if they are funny. He also points towards some parts of the female laugh ritual as being 'suggestive' in it's own right (head back, eyes closed, mouth slightly open repetitive vocalisation and breathlessness) as food for thought.
But everyone does the head-back, open-mouth, breathless and rhythmic funny noises thing when they laugh. There's no special 'female laugh ritual'.
About the evolutionary explanation... I made some vague point a while ago about how laughter makes you physically vulnerable, and that could explain a male reluctance or resistance to laughing when with women, particularly with women that he wishes to impress with his manly strength and self-control.
I suppose making someone laugh is a way of overpowering them, reducing them to a weakened state. (Remember the 'military applications of the world's funniest joke' Python sketch'?)
Edited by aiki, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Modulous, posted 05-05-2010 6:47 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Modulous, posted 05-05-2010 1:06 PM aiki has not replied

  
aiki
Member (Idle past 4314 days)
Posts: 43
Joined: 04-28-2010


Message 140 of 269 (558874)
05-05-2010 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Straggler
05-05-2010 10:28 AM


Re: A Poor Joke
Sorry everyone.........
It seems that by the general consensus of this thread I am a woman. Comedically at least.
I won't be giving up the day job.
I've always quite liked that joke. Maybe you have a point

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 10:28 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 11:06 AM aiki has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.5


Message 141 of 269 (558879)
05-05-2010 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by onifre
05-05-2010 10:06 AM


Analyzing humor, seriously.
Hey Oni,
So, it seems funny stand-up material (which could have been co-written or ghost written), performed/honed flawlessly over time can be successfully delivered by not-so-funny-but-excellent-performers/actors.
As per Mod's summary above of Hitchen's video, Mod writes "Men are faster than women". (I still haven't watched the video, I need to use my brother's home computer later)
If this is true, maybe stand up comedy should be somewhat less weighted to measure GENDER humor, because, for reasons above, it does NOT NECESSARILY show quick wit . . .
If this is also true, than perhaps we should more weight interviews or talk show environments where the absence of scripted environments COULD lend a crutch to those who are less funny.
Can we test this hypothesis? In your opinion, how funny would your examples of funny women (Sarah Silverman, Andi Smith, Tina Fey) be in interviews or as talk show hosts?
Compared to Rivers, Ellen Degeneress, Rosie O-Donnel? (Regardless of how unfunny you think they are, they are more quicker-witted than the average person, correct?).
Alas, should quick-wit be the overall measure of funny?
E.g. Lucy Ball, great comedic actor, but crappy interviewee. Thusly, not a funny person.
Do you agree with any of this?
Edited by dronester, : used correct science terminology
Edited by dronester, : clarity
Edited by dronester, : more clarity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by onifre, posted 05-05-2010 10:06 AM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by onifre, posted 05-05-2010 4:00 PM dronestar has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


(1)
Message 142 of 269 (558880)
05-05-2010 11:06 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by aiki
05-05-2010 10:37 AM


Re: A Poor Joke
Well we can arrange a girls night out and tell each other lame-arse jokes while Oni drinks himself to death in a manly bout of beer-laden despair.
The pina colladas are on you!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 10:37 AM aiki has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 11:29 AM Straggler has replied

  
aiki
Member (Idle past 4314 days)
Posts: 43
Joined: 04-28-2010


Message 143 of 269 (558883)
05-05-2010 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by Straggler
05-05-2010 11:06 AM


Re: A Poor Joke
Well we can arrange a girls night out and tell each other lame-arse jokes while Oni drinks himself to death in a manly bout of beer-laden despair.
The pina colladas are on you!!
Spectacular! I KNEW I hadn't made a terrible mistake registering on this website...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 11:06 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 11:38 AM aiki has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


(1)
Message 144 of 269 (558885)
05-05-2010 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by aiki
05-05-2010 11:29 AM


Last Wordism
Yeah! - Go girl!!
(**** "It's Raining Men" blasts away in the background as Straggler struggles with his earrings ****)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 11:29 AM aiki has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 11:57 AM Straggler has replied

  
aiki
Member (Idle past 4314 days)
Posts: 43
Joined: 04-28-2010


Message 145 of 269 (558887)
05-05-2010 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 144 by Straggler
05-05-2010 11:38 AM


Last Whatism?
(*** takes full advantage of Straggler's momentary difficulties by seizing him for a faux-lesbian snog to impress the boys ***)
This IS good-natured banter, right? I'm not very good at judging stuff like that online... must be a chick thing... Anyway, I hope it is cos I always liked your posts. I especially enjoyed the redoubtable 'EvC rap'

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 11:38 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 12:04 PM aiki has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


(1)
Message 146 of 269 (558888)
05-05-2010 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by aiki
05-05-2010 11:57 AM


Re: Last Was-ism?
(*** takes full advantage of Straggler's momentary difficulties by seizing him for a faux-lesbian snog to impress the boys ***)
I've pulled
It seems I am (even) more successful with the ladies as a woman than I am as a man.
This IS good-natured banter, right?
I believe so. That is what the guys call it. I think.
I especially enjoyed the redoubtable 'EvC rap'
Well it is always nice to meet a "fan". But I didn't know you were around in my EvC wigga days? Did you lurk for long before joining in?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 11:57 AM aiki has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 12:21 PM Straggler has replied

  
aiki
Member (Idle past 4314 days)
Posts: 43
Joined: 04-28-2010


Message 147 of 269 (558890)
05-05-2010 12:21 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Straggler
05-05-2010 12:04 PM


Re: Last Was-ism?
I believe so. That is what the guys call it. I think.
Ah, those guys, with their subtle ways and mysterious nuances...
Did you lurk for long before joining in?
Yes. Ages. Well over a year, anyway. I am very interested in evolution and natural history in general. But I don't have a particularly strong science background and next to no debating background. The level of debate here is frequently wonderful. And anyway I'm more of a listener than a talker (usually). Would like to contribute more though. I'm always poised to answer questions about British wildlife.
I've lurked on the FRDB forum for just as long, only joined up there quite recently and then only to identify a caterpillar for someone.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 12:04 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 12:45 PM aiki has replied

  
Jumped Up Chimpanzee
Member (Idle past 4964 days)
Posts: 572
From: UK
Joined: 10-22-2009


Message 148 of 269 (558891)
05-05-2010 12:22 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by onifre
05-05-2010 10:26 AM


Wanda Sykes
Is Wanda Sykes the one who occasionally appears in Curb Your Enthusiasm, always giving LD a hard time?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by onifre, posted 05-05-2010 10:26 AM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by onifre, posted 05-05-2010 3:25 PM Jumped Up Chimpanzee has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 149 of 269 (558898)
05-05-2010 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by aiki
05-05-2010 12:21 PM


Re: Last Was-ism?
Ah, those guys, with their subtle ways and mysterious nuances...
I know I know. It's a wonder how us girls can ever get to grips with their alien customs and bizarre rituals.
Did you lurk for long before joining in?
Yes. Ages. Well over a year, anyway. I am very interested in evolution and natural history in general. But I don't have a particularly strong science background and next to no debating background. The level of debate here is frequently wonderful.
Christ - If most here let ignorance or lack of debating skill deter them this place would be a typographical desert. I have found pseudo-intellectualism, a decent vocabulary and an inclination to fervently fly into an argument regardless of any initial knowledge as a more than sufficient basis to participate. But maybe that is just me.....
Would like to contribute more though.
You should!! Seriously as long as you can research stuff to layman level that is all that is really required to meaningfully take part in even the most technical threads. The real experts that EvC is blessed with are willing to educate all but the most stubbornly dogmatic (of which there are also plenty). And a lot of threads are not that technical or even debate heavy anyway. And you can always just undertake debate target practice on hardline creos if you want some fun for the hell of it
And anyway I'm more of a listener than a talker (usually).
Not in this thread. Loudmouth
I'm always poised to answer questions about British wildlife. I've lurked on the FRDB forum for just as long, only joined up there quite recently and then only to identify a caterpillar for someone.
Quality. One never knows when a wildlife expert will come in handy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 12:21 PM aiki has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by aiki, posted 05-11-2010 4:40 AM Straggler has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 150 of 269 (558906)
05-05-2010 1:06 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by aiki
05-05-2010 10:34 AM


Re: Has Hitchens not been brought up yet?
But everyone does the head-back, open-mouth, breathless and rhythmic funny noises thing when they laugh. There's no special 'female laugh ritual'.
And everyone has nipples.
I made some vague point a while ago about how laughter makes you physically vulnerable, and that could explain a male reluctance or resistance to laughing when with women, particularly with women that he wishes to impress with his manly strength and self-control.
This may be true - but it doesn't explain why women find women less funny than men. If that were true (and I believe some very small scale studies have shown that it might be), then we really do have a behavioural differences between us and it's something to think about. Is it genetic or cultural? Is it genetic that its cultural?
I suppose making someone laugh is a way of overpowering them, reducing them to a weakened state.
Maybe that would explain being funny - and Hitchens raises the point regarding laughter being a kind of surrender. It still raises the question of the forms of laughter and why they take on the forms they do (Why do we curl up into a spasming ball? What's paying for that?), I'm not sure if the 'looks a bit like having sex' phenomenon has any particular support. Maybe some of the habits in sex emulate laughter instead?
Some ideas look at it as a possible signal of communal 'all safe' noise, similar to that which our cousins make (or even, "Attack!" which might contribute towards explaining Schadenfreude and black comedy). When we encounter a confusing situation, once we have understood that it is just an absurd lingustic play, we alert others not to worry about the paradoxical or strange content. There is good evidence (and you can test it yourself) that people laugh harder and longer when in a crowd that is also laughing. I'm sure we've all experienced the sensation of being unable to stop from laughing despite your best intentions when surrounded by others. So the primal primate communal signalling idea has some merit perhaps.
It would be interesting to do a survey. First find how people rate sense of humour highly as a relatively important feature in a sexual partner.
Of those that do, ask why is that important.
It would be interesting to see if there was a sex based difference between "I want someone who can make me laugh" and "I want someone who will laugh at my jokes." type answers. It would be even more fascinating if we could tell if they were telling the truth or not
Anyway...erm. Yeah. I have yet to see conclusive studies that answer any of this, and I've been playing with introducing a 'Evolution of Laughter: Why did God create laughing at willies and farts again?' topic for a while but I've never been able to polish it off (fnar).
Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by aiki, posted 05-05-2010 10:34 AM aiki has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Straggler, posted 05-05-2010 1:20 PM Modulous has seen this message but not replied
 Message 175 by dronestar, posted 05-07-2010 11:02 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024