Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,780 Year: 4,037/9,624 Month: 908/974 Week: 235/286 Day: 42/109 Hour: 4/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Assessing the Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth (RATE) Project
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 760 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 28 of 36 (565107)
06-14-2010 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Jzyehoshua
06-14-2010 6:33 PM


Re: Another gross mistake
and have yet to receive a solid answer on the subject of why half-lives can't decay faster.
Half-lives don't decay. Half-lives are one way of expressing the measurement of how fast radioactive elements decay.
There are examples of the rate of decay changing a bit for some nuclei. These examples don't include carbon-14, potassium-40, uranium-235 or -238, or othere nuclei used for dating in the context of rocks. It is plausible that, if you stripped all 19 electrons from a potassium atom, its beta-decay rate would change. It's likely been calculated by how much it would change. But only one electron gets stripped off in earthly environments, so it is immaterial when you're dating rocks.
Go read this thread:
EvC Forum: Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
the correlations among various dating methods will amaze you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Jzyehoshua, posted 06-14-2010 6:33 PM Jzyehoshua has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024