Author
|
Topic: The UK Election!!!!
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: All Losers
Yeah, I know what you mean. At least Nick Griffin lost his seat, though too.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 213 by Straggler, posted 05-07-2010 4:25 AM | | Straggler has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 299 of 427 (560422)
05-15-2010 6:03 AM
|
Reply to: Message 296 by Straggler 05-15-2010 12:44 AM
|
|
Re: VOTE NOW - Calling All UK Members
This is how I would cast my vote. Deficit reduction Voting reform
This message is a reply to: | | Message 296 by Straggler, posted 05-15-2010 12:44 AM | | Straggler has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: VOTE NOW - Calling All UK Members
Righto. Financial reform (break up the banks so they have to stand on their own two feet). Overhauling the nhs to reduce bureaucracy.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 300 by Straggler, posted 05-15-2010 6:43 AM | | Straggler has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 304 of 427 (560433)
05-15-2010 7:33 AM
|
Reply to: Message 301 by Huntard 05-15-2010 6:50 AM
|
|
Re: VOTE NOW - Calling All UK Members
Less taxes! Kick out the towelheads/cameljockeys/sandniggers Are you my next door neighbour?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 301 by Huntard, posted 05-15-2010 6:50 AM | | Huntard has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 306 by Huntard, posted 05-15-2010 11:10 AM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Politicus Maximus
What's this site http://www.politicusmaximus.net/cgi-bin/dBoard.cgi ? I see familiar names! Am I going crazy? Is it a off shoot of EvC?
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Politicus Maximus
Yeah, Larni, where have you been!? I could ask you the same question Got to say I was suprised to find out who you are/were: I remember thinking when you arrived (as Hyro) that I could not get a handle on which side of the fence you were on. Like the albino Vader...
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Politicus Maximus
Well, it's nice to see old names popping back here; hope it pathes the way for other exodites to return.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 363 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-01-2010 11:12 AM | | Hyroglyphx has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 402 of 427 (728057)
05-23-2014 4:51 AM
|
Reply to: Message 398 by Modulous 05-22-2014 3:14 PM
|
|
Re: Coalition Conundrum
The Conservatives want a bigger share, so they are in all manner of dilemmas when it comes to figuring out how to do that. The Tories are a bit buggered I 'reckon'. They have to throw the libs some bones but they also don't want the more right wing voters turning their coats to UKIP (boo hiss). Personally I hate the libs because they took the Tory shilling, the Tories because they are a bunch of Toffs and UKIP because a nice coat of paint on a racist still leaves you with a racist. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation -Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities. -Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to: | | Message 398 by Modulous, posted 05-22-2014 3:14 PM | | Modulous has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 407 of 427 (728141)
05-24-2014 10:16 AM
|
Reply to: Message 406 by Modulous 05-23-2014 4:58 PM
|
|
Re: Coalition Conundrum
Don't get me wrong, my politics are mostly liberal but the current collection of of lackwits means I cannot in good conscience vote for them. As for UKIP? I guess people want to be able to be racist but have the legitimacy of a high profile political party to validate their behaviour. What I hope is that UKIP guts the Torrys and then implodes on itself. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation -Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities. -Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to: | | Message 406 by Modulous, posted 05-23-2014 4:58 PM | | Modulous has seen this message but not replied |
|