I agree that no one had come up with a good creationist argument, but I'd imagine that a great many people would be interested in such an argument if there ever was such a thing-- especially if it came with actual evidence.
I can understand why creationists would be afraid of the evidence for evolution. They've been indoctrinated to believe that they have to have faith in a certain version of events to live "happily ever after" and some have been threatened with hell for a loss of that faith.
But then their delusion has to include this world where scientists are uninterested in the facts even though these facts could help them live happily ever after! If there was an invisible being who wanted people to believe certain things to live happily after they die, then wouldn't every scientist be interested in finding out more about that being and what he wanted so they could make their own eternity fabulous? Wouldn't they be gathering, and testing all the evidence-- testing various prophets and so forth to see which one could do the most, predict the best, raise the dead or whatever?
When stuff is true, the evidence accumulates-- look at all we've done with DNA-- mapped genomes, paternity tests, forensics, etc. It just must take a lot of paranoia, indoctrination, and obfuscation to tell yourself that science is a conspiracy and that the real truth belongs to a certain sect which developed on the planet less than 2000 years ago.
But this idea of scientists killing people...?! I can only imagine that a person who thinks that has gotten science confused with religion. It's religion that cares about what people believe; Science cares about what is true regardless of what people believe.