|
Author
|
Topic: Hugh Ross
|
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: 09-02-2008
|
|
Message 40 of 90 (570078)
07-25-2010 12:40 PM
|
Reply to: Message 34 by Flyer75
07-25-2010 9:56 AM
|
|
Re: My take on Hugh Ross
Flyer75 writes: Lyell and Hutton were atheists...
According to Wikiepdia quote:
Lyell, a devout Christian, had great difficulty reconciling his beliefs with natural selection.
And Hutton has a memorial plaque in Christchurch Cathedral.
{ABE}: It was brought to my attention that you probably meant another Hutton. As you can see in the article, this guy was a Deist. so the point I made still stands.  {/ABE} The site where you read they were both atheists lied to you, Flyer. Edited by Huntard, : Added {ABE} bit
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 34 by Flyer75, posted 07-25-2010 9:56 AM | | Flyer75 has not replied |
|
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: 09-02-2008
|
Re: thats some lie
Bolder-dash writes: Now, if I asked you to show evidence that all life on earth is somehow related, then hey, you might have something there. Did you accidentally recall hearing that?
Did you or did you not, in Message 49, when you said this:
Bolder-dash writes: Well, it is YOU, who has made the accusation that people are ignoring, thosands as you say, so it is incumbent on you to give a few of these examples.
Ask for evidence that creationists are ignoring?
|
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: 09-02-2008
|
Re: thats some lie
Bolder-dash writes: As I suspected, none of you has any evidence at all for your versions of evolution, you only have what you feel is evidence for common descent. No surprise there.
Uhm, common descent is the result of evolution, meaning that the evidence for common descent is evidence that evolution occurred. Perhaps I'm missing something here, could you be more clear please? Also, that's not what I asked you about, so, let me try again:
Huntard writes:
Bolder-dash writes: Now, if I asked you to show evidence that all life on earth is somehow related, then hey, you might have something there. Did you accidentally recall hearing that?
Did you or did you not, in Message 49, when you said this:
Bolder-dash writes: Well, it is YOU, who has made the accusation that people are ignoring, thosands as you say, so it is incumbent on you to give a few of these examples.
Ask for evidence that creationists are ignoring?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 64 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-26-2010 4:30 AM | | Bolder-dash has not replied |
|
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: 09-02-2008
|
Bolder-dash writes: Gee, I can point to a number of evolutionists who have lied, Granny Magda, Dr. A certainly, Huntard..., so I guess evolutionists always lie.
Please point to where I have lied. Or retract your slander.
|
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: 09-02-2008
|
Bolder-dash writes: But can you prove you don't lie, ever?
Nope, no one can. Can you prove the things Wounded King asked of you? Now, I don;t say you do, I have no reason to assume you do, but until I can prove you do, I will not accuse you of it either. Apparently, you think it's ok to accuse someone of lying, and then not provide any evidence for your accusation. Isn't that bearing false witness?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 79 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-27-2010 9:12 AM | | Bolder-dash has not replied |
|
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: 09-02-2008
|
Not that I completely doubt this, as I think Freud was rather a loony, but you wouldn't have any sources for this, would you?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 87 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-27-2010 11:27 AM | | Bolder-dash has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2