Potassium Argon Sensitivity Analysis

This kind of research is all through the technical journals. It has been for well over a century. That is where science is conducted!And you are right, the fine details of scientific research are often not on the internet. Find a nice big library and get lost in the journals for a few weeks. Or months.If you want the truth, though, I think you're a creationist trying to cast your doubt on the scientific process in order to reinforce your beliefs. I may be wrong, I hope so, but I've seen this same approach many times before.

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Good for you.But can you bring your arguments here where you might face some folks knowledgeable in the subject?We have several threads on C14 dating, and I'd love to see you bring your arguments here.By the way, I do a lot of C14 dating in my work and am pretty familiar with the method and its potential problems. Are you? Or are you one of the "assumptions automatically = wrong" creationists?

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

There are a number of species that do not do more than one ring a year. That's why those are chosen for tree-ring dating. Bristlecone pines are a good example.