...you don't think that, if certain political positions spawn primarily from a physiological defect that causes an overabundance of fear rather than any sort of rational thought process, this is a problem?
So, you;re perfectly fine with major political policy decisions being made based on an admittedly emotional basis of fear rather than pragmatic, realistic policies driven by accurate information and rational thinking?
Wasn't it the Russians who, back in the bad old days, locked up and drugged many who opposed them on the basis of their "mental illness?"
What is it with liberals and other totalitarians who can't stand any form of disagreement with their positions? They start by classifying disagreement as hate speech, but how long will it be before this article, done in jest, is actually tried for real?
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.