Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Earth’s population was 10,000 persons
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 194 (601890)
01-24-2011 8:59 PM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the When Earth’s population was 10,000 persons thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.
OK, let's give this one a go.
1) On CD's scale of things, this one seems pretty coherent.
2) This actually seems to be a fresh, not beaten to death topic.
Adminnemooseus
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Add post-promotion comments.

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 11 of 194 (601935)
01-25-2011 2:26 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Taz
01-25-2011 2:06 AM


I best I know, CrazyDiamond7 is not a YEC...
...and you seem to be dragging a YECism into the topic (red herring?).
I don't see a C. 4300 BC "great flood" as being relevant to this topic, and have declared your message to be "off-topic".
No replies to this message at this topic. If you feel you must, go to The Whine List topic.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Taz, posted 01-25-2011 2:06 AM Taz has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 15 of 194 (602074)
01-25-2011 11:08 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Taz
01-25-2011 10:54 PM


Putting things into the OP, that are not in the OP
I think it is already well established (according to the OP at least) that scientists are dumbasses and that dating methods are wrong.
While message 1 is far from the desired clearly laid out topic starter we like to see, I don't see either YECim/floodism or the above quoted as being there stated. If you wish to argue this, please quote the relevant portion of message 1 and explain your perceptions of the quoted.
In general, you're presenting non-topic snark - The sort of thing for which I've several times suspended Dr. Adequate.
Adminnemooseus
Added by edit: My compliments to the content of message 13.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Taz, posted 01-25-2011 10:54 PM Taz has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 17 of 194 (602078)
01-26-2011 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Buzsaw
01-26-2011 12:36 AM


Re: Henry Morris On Global Population Problem
I really don't see CrazyDiamond7 having invoked any sort of C. 5000 years ago human population bottleneck. Thus I see anything "Great Flood" to be off-topic.
If you wish to discuss the worlds human population as having started from your post flood time and numbers, please propose a new topic.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Buzsaw, posted 01-26-2011 12:36 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024