Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Foot bone further supports that A. aferensis walked upright
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3801 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 1 of 5 (604281)
02-10-2011 9:11 PM


Analysis of the fourth metatarsal remains of A. Aferensis individuals now seem to provide solid evidence that A. afarensis habitually walked upright. The fourth metatarsal bone was found to have a 'twist' such that when one end is attached to the toe the other end rises up, this torsion is found in feet with an arch. This also shows that 'Lucy's' feet had evolved away from the flexible midfoot found in apes, that enables them to grasp branches.
Exciting news! Maybe not as exciting as the discover of a new species of humans but close.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Coyote, posted 02-10-2011 9:26 PM DBlevins has not replied

  
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3801 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 5 of 5 (604387)
02-11-2011 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Taq
02-11-2011 11:42 AM


Was the common ancestor of chimps and humans functionally bipedal or arboreal?
You're right that there is still a good amount of debate on why/how humans evolved bipedal motion. Some of the hypotheses that I recall were the thermoregulation model, the behavior model, food-transportation model, and the savannah hypothesis. I also think there was the climate model. oh yes, the aquatic theory also.
As far as whether our common ancestor with the chimps was functionally bipedal or arboreal, it would seem evident that it would have been arboreal yet, like chimpanzees today, spent time on the ground foraging. After the split, bipedalism developed in our lineage.
...but does finding adaptations for bipedalism so close the common ancestor indicate a bipedal common ancestor?
I would say no, for the simple fact that fossil evidence suggests that we evolved from an arboreal ancestor, and I don't know of any evidence that suggests apes reverted back to knuckle walking after being bipedal.
At the same time, australopithecines also have adaptations for tree climbing, most noticebly in the range of motion for the shoulder and adaptations in the wrist.
Iirc A. anemensis's foot bones were more primitive than A. aferensis and still retained features that allowed it to be arboreal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Taq, posted 02-11-2011 11:42 AM Taq has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024