Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,426 Year: 3,683/9,624 Month: 554/974 Week: 167/276 Day: 7/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Japan
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


(1)
Message 120 of 175 (609249)
03-17-2011 5:41 PM


Mankind has a tendency to push the envelope, but we learn from our mistakes for the most part.
Take our space program, after Apollo 1 burned on the pad, Should we have quit? After Challenger? Both were cases where we acted upon what we thought were acceptable risk. WE were wrong and we learned from them and as a result we went to moon, and built an international space station. We didn't condemn the space program because of failures. We learned from them and made spaceflight safer. More will die, and we will learn from it.
Ad astra per aspera
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 128 of 175 (609375)
03-18-2011 5:09 PM


Seems to me there might be a market for an emergency response remote operated vehicle of some type. I am sure somebody would be working something like that. I look at the capibilities of ROVs used in off-shore drilling and wonder why some of this or similar technology couldn't be used to make an emergency response vehicle for hazmat situations. I can think of quite a few possible applications. Have a modular tool packages for quickly outfitting them for different task.
If nothing else then maybe the nuclear industry could get together and create a emergency response team with these types specialized vehicles thereby spreading cost out over the participating operators.

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 150 of 175 (609708)
03-22-2011 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by Percy
03-22-2011 1:04 PM


Re: Robot Question
Percy writes:
I see many comments in the news about the lack of close-up information about containment facilities and cooling ponds. This seems an ideal application for robots. Images, videos, temperature readings, radioactivity measurements, it seems like robots should be able to provide all of these types of things, yet I see no mention of robots.
I just now decided I should Google the topic before sending this out and discovered I'm not the first to ask this question: Where are the robots in Japan's nuclear crisis?
It came out a couple days ago, talks about some of the possible robot alternatives.
--Percy
I thought the same thing in an earlier post 4 days ago, msg 128 in this discussion. It seems like there should be more ROV's available to do dangerous stuff in many industries.
Here in the USA at least, we should look at having a highly trained group that can respond to emergencies like Japan is having. Hopefully it never will but if you roll dice long enough....
Maybe it could be paid for a tax put on nuclear or even a broader group of dangerous industries? Just a thought.
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.
Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by Percy, posted 03-22-2011 1:04 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by Percy, posted 03-29-2011 3:54 PM fearandloathing has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 152 of 175 (609715)
03-22-2011 3:11 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by jar
03-22-2011 2:06 PM


Re: Robot Question
jar writes:
Humans are still relatively plentiful, available and very rapidly reprogrammed and tasked.
Humans are also great at running remote operated vehicles. These ROV's could possibly work in high radiation/ heat environments that their human operators could not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by jar, posted 03-22-2011 2:06 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by jar, posted 03-22-2011 3:20 PM fearandloathing has replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 154 of 175 (609717)
03-22-2011 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by jar
03-22-2011 3:20 PM


Re: Robot Question
We can only hope. I am sure somebody out there is working the ROV angle now as I write. Sad it takes a bad thing to sometimes push us along with implementing something I am sure has been thought of by many, but they couldn't afford to test and build a prototype or more likely didnt see a market for one. Money is always a factor. There would be problem of only being able to use ROV's once if they get irradiated also....cost probably wouldn't concern people of japan right now though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by jar, posted 03-22-2011 3:20 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by jar, posted 03-22-2011 3:45 PM fearandloathing has replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 156 of 175 (609719)
03-22-2011 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by jar
03-22-2011 3:45 PM


Re: Robot Question
Well I guess the Japaneese govt asking I-ROBOT for assistance speaks volumes, read percy's link in the msg 149. ROV's could be used for many things non-nuclear, search and rescue, other industrial accidents, well fires....
I agree the nuclear issue is being used because people fear it, irrationally usualy, keeps people watching and there are many sides to put their 2 cents in.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by jar, posted 03-22-2011 3:45 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 157 by jar, posted 03-22-2011 4:00 PM fearandloathing has replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 158 of 175 (609722)
03-22-2011 4:23 PM
Reply to: Message 157 by jar
03-22-2011 4:00 PM


Re: Robot Question
jar writes:
And that's a very important point. It's very possible that many ROV's are being used, for example in search and rescue, even in infrastructure inspection and assessment, and those would have a far higher immediate priority than the nuclear power sites.
I agree.
Looking at the role ROV's and other unmanned vehicle are playing in the military, off-shore drilling....it will only be a matter of time before we see their use more wide spread and affordable for many things including nuclear response.
I am no engineer, but working in a high radiation environment will present its own uniqe problems, shielding the electronics/ sensor package for one. Handling it after exposure for maintenance or to replace tool package....many things to be considered. Disposal of it after job is done, maybe?
I feel as you do though that they will play larger roles in inspection, Search and rescue, explosive ordnance/bomb removal.. as they should.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by jar, posted 03-22-2011 4:00 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 159 of 175 (609825)
03-23-2011 1:34 PM


new imiages on google earth
There is new imagery available on google earth of Japan after the quake/tsunami, the first ones I found are near Fukushima Nuke stations. I am sure there is more, but these of coastal area show the scope of what they face in rebuilding. The image dates I've been looking at are the 11th & 12th of this month, by turning on time line you can compare to older images.

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 169 of 175 (611990)
04-12-2011 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by Rahvin
04-12-2011 12:53 PM


Re: unreasonably pessimistic?
We cannot overlook the fact that the govt of Japan has reacted to this better than the soviets did. People have been evacuated faster.
I guess as years pass statistics might show a spike in certain types of cancers that could be interpreted as " above background levels". Saying for certain that they are from radiation may be little harder.
So far Chernobyl released 10x the radiation that Fukushima has, and the levels of radioactive fission products is not the same. Chernobyl's core was completely exposed. If the used fuel ponds were to become completely exposed then things might take a turn for worst.
I also cannot see Japan having a giant zone like around Chernobyl, I might be wrong, but I think they will clean it up if at all possible. Japan being a free country will have to handle this different than soviets did.

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Rahvin, posted 04-12-2011 12:53 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 170 of 175 (611993)
04-12-2011 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by Taq
04-12-2011 3:39 PM


Re: unreasonably pessimistic?
lol, I just said bout the same thing, I was writing my last msg while you were posting your msg, I agree competly. Japan is a free country and this benifits the people of Japan.

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Taq, posted 04-12-2011 3:39 PM Taq has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 175 of 175 (612496)
04-16-2011 10:03 AM
Reply to: Message 174 by Percy
04-14-2011 1:54 PM


Re: Documentary
Percy writes:
I just watched a documentary titled Witness: Disaster in Japan on the National Geographic channel. Doesn't seem to be on-line yet anywhere, but I expect segments of it will show up on-line, but it's best watched in HD. There seems to be a lot of previously unseen footage. Here's a description from Witness Disaster in Japan with National Geographic:
Raman Media Network writes:
Premiering on Wednesday, April 13, 2011, at 10 p.m. ET/PT, just over a month after the disaster occurred, Witness: Disaster in Japan weaves together an array of video sources some rarely seen, and others shown in more depth to build a comprehensive one-hour special that exemplifies the sheer magnitude of the disaster in chronological order, starting with the earthquake’s first tremor through the devastation caused by the tsunami.
I expect it will be rebroadcast, get your TiVo's ready.
--Percy
Is going to be run again Sunday 17th at 9pm EDT here.

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by Percy, posted 04-14-2011 1:54 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024