Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Libya
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 33 (609536)
03-21-2011 11:04 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Dogmafood
03-20-2011 11:00 PM


Dogmafood writes:
From what I can see the resolution
demands the immediate establishment of a ceasefire and a complete end to violence and all attacks against, and abuses of, civilians;
imposes a no-fly zone over Libya;
authorises all necessary means to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas, except for a "foreign occupation force";
strengthens the arms embargo and particularly action against mercenaries, by allowing for forcible inspections of ships and planes;
imposes a ban on all Libyan-designated flights;
imposes an asset freeze on assets owned by the Libyan authorities, and reaffirms that such assets should be used for the benefit of the Libyan people;
extends the travel ban and assets freeze of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 to a number of additional individuals and Libyan entities;
establishes a panel of experts to monitor and promote sanctions implementation.
Source
Gaddhafi is a terrorist and a thug and should be killed off. What amazes me is the blatant hypocrisy of it all. I guess the way it works is that you sell some nut job lots of guns and tanks and then you blow them up, install a new nut job and then sell him lots of guns and tanks and then...
Arms sales to Libya
In reality, how can we spend $1.3 trillion/yr on our armies and not expect to shoot some of them guns?
We and our NATO allies should not have intervened in either Egypt or Lybia's affairs, nor should we have occupied Iraq and Afganistan.
Both dictators, Mubarak and Gaddafi were at least abiding by the peace treaty with Israel and neither were attacking us or our interests. Both were important sources of our oil.
The problem in taking out both dictators is the alternative, which will most assuredly be the militant Jehadist/shariah Muslim Brotherhood allied with and supported by Iran.
Prophetically, this is all about establishing the emerging global pro-Muslim/Russia coalition army of the New World Order, i.e. the 10 horned beast of Revelation 13.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Dogmafood, posted 03-20-2011 11:00 PM Dogmafood has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Omnivorous, posted 03-21-2011 11:51 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 13 by Dogmafood, posted 03-21-2011 8:18 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 15 by Dr Adequate, posted 03-21-2011 11:54 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 33 (609836)
03-23-2011 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Dr Adequate
03-21-2011 11:54 PM


Re: Islamic Brotherhood
Dr Adequate writes:
Buzsaw writes:
... allied with and supported by Iran.
The M.B. are Sunnis.
Nevertheless they are more alligned with Iran (Shiia) and have opposed oppose Mubarak and Gadaffi (Sunni)
quote:
...Iran has consistently allied itself with the Muslim Brotherhood, even if there have been tensions and rhetorical disputes from time to time. On a strictly political level, Iran also shares the Brotherhood's deep animosity for Hosni Mubarak's regime. Iran also shared the Egyptian Islamists' hatred of Anwar Sadat, which is why Khomeini had a street named after Khalid Islambouli -- Sadat's assassin -- and declared him a martyr. Since Islambouli was an Egyptian Islamic Jihad operative, we have come back to Ayman al Zawahiri's part in this story.
Dr Adequate writes:
Buzsaw writes:
Prophetically, this is all about establishing the emerging global pro-Muslim/Russia coalition army of the New World Order, i.e. the 10 horned beast of Revelation 13.
Well that's good, then. Isn't the end of the world something you're meant to be looking forward to?
No. I'm looking for the emerging messianic era which this is all leading up to. To delve into that would be another topic. It has been alluded to in other threads.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Dr Adequate, posted 03-21-2011 11:54 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by jar, posted 03-23-2011 5:02 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024