Please..who know about GARIAEV researchs?

P.P.Gariaev writes:A quartz cuvette with a DNA sample is moved from one location to another. And a trace, a phantom, is left in the air in the original location of the sample. This phenomenon was registered using the laser spectroscopy method by P. Gariaev in 1984 in Russia and by the group of R. Pecora in 1990 in the U.S.A.

Stuart A.Allison, Susan S.Sorlie and R.Pecora. Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Wormlike Chains: Dynamic Light Scattering from a 2311 Base Pair DNA Fragment. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 1110-1118 writes:Also, shot noise present in experiments would be expected to increase the amplitude of the second and higher peaks. One possible explanation is the presence of trace amounts dust in light scattering experiments. When a small (comparable to the noise level) amplitude component of a gradual exponential decay is added to simulated g(t) data, mimicking the effect of dust, the CONTIN distribution function can be significantly altered.

Gariaev writes:As a matter of fact similar effect had been observed by Allison et.al. who also used DLLD method to study restrictive fragments of DNA. The research group also observed anomalous light-dispersion/scattering of such objects. The authors defined the phenomena as ‘mimicking the effect of dust’. In their experiments the effect was not due to any form of dust contamination but was a consequence of behavior of the object which acted as a dust particle scattering light. To sum up the finding, such a conduct of the particles produces characteristics of light-dispersion which do not comply with the classical models of light-dispersion for linear polymers. There can be found a common ground between these two kind of experiments (Allison et.al. and Gariaev et.al.) related to the fact that DNA samples were irradiated by light in the visible spectrum - 632.8 nm and 488 nm. In the formation process of DNA wave replicas, a dominant function is assumed by, perhaps, the emitter whose wavelength coincides/matches with the DNA’s absorption wavelength.

Peter Gariaev writes:you are mudak

Peter Gariaev writes:... See my site in respect our publications ...

jar writes:And yet another (maybe or maybe not) spammer shows up.

One thing I find interesting is that most of these apparent "sock puppets" have have accounts that are months old, even though they have made few if any posts before today.