Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 0/64 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Love Wins - Rob Bell
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 10 of 30 (612758)
04-18-2011 3:08 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by GDR
04-18-2011 2:34 PM


GDR writes:
...the only problem I had with the book is that I would like tohave heard more about what he specifically believes about his Christian faith
I only briefly read some of your links and such, but from what I can gather this is on purpose. That is, Rob Bell doesn't talk specifically about his beliefs because he doesn't think such things are important:
quote:
Bell's view is "that God is love, that he sent Jesus to show us that love, that love demands freedom. So making definitive judgments about other people's destiny is not interesting to me. The heart of God is to rescue everyone from everything we need to be rescued from."
This "freedom" that the love demands would encompass many of the specifics I would guess that you want to know. So, I would guess that even if you asked him directly, his answer would not be so much a specific answer as more of a general "let's not get hung up on details" dismissal anyway.
Actually I don't think the Time article accurately reflects Bell's beliefs about hell. Bell claims that he is not a universalist and I would agree with that. He does however assert, as do many others, that in the end those that wind up in hell choose it.
The Hell Rob talks about is just 'separation from God,' yes? Not necessarily eternal torment in the generally direct fire/painful sense? In this way, I can see some folk choosing to be away from God... and therefore "choosing Hell."
Bottom line it does depart from the distorted Christian view that what matters is getting our theology right.
I agree. I'm no Bible-scholar, but isn't that one of Jesus' main messages to the Pharisees? Not to focus on getting the theology right, but to focus on being a good person?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by GDR, posted 04-18-2011 2:34 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by GDR, posted 04-18-2011 3:25 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 13 of 30 (612764)
04-18-2011 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by GDR
04-18-2011 3:12 PM


Lots of questions, just curious
GDR writes:
In the end, and I believe that is very scriptural, (read Matthew 25 with the separating of the sheep and the goats), we choose between selfish love and unselfish love. If at the end we choose to hang on to our love of self and we reject a world that is characterized by unselfish love then we will have chosen hell whatever that looks like.
Is faith important at all? If so, which has priority?
It's certainly possible for someone to experience and choose unselfish love over selfish love without using faith in Jesus (or faith in much of anything, really). Therefore, faith is irrelevant to one's eternal life placement?
(Maybe this apathy towards faith is why so many are calling Rob Bell a heretic?)
Where do you think faith fits into all this?
Just a useful tool for some to find the path to unselfish love?
Or something that's more... required for some other important message?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by GDR, posted 04-18-2011 3:12 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by GDR, posted 04-19-2011 12:21 AM Stile has replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 23 of 30 (612952)
04-20-2011 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by GDR
04-19-2011 12:21 AM


Re: Lots of questions, just curious
GDR writes:
I think that faith is crucial. The question is faith in what and for what reason. If we are talking about where we spend eternity then it is a matter of having faith in the Christ’s message of love, forgiveness, mercy, kindness, justice etc. I don’t see anywhere in the scriptures that those attributes will only be found amongst those that call themselves Christian.
I agree... kinda.
I think that if we are going to follow the Message of Love (love, forgiveness, mercy, kindness, justice etc...), than we are forced to "have faith."
I don't think there's an objective, absolute way to show that these things are "better" than evil things. In this sense, I think we must have faith that these things are "good" and live our lives in that fashion.
...there is the slightly reality-based fact that if we go about being evil, we're likely to be punished or even killed by our community. This would be a non-faith reason (self-preservation) to carry the Message of Love (or, at least act in that manner), but I think the faith-based reason to carry the message is a much more honorable reason than one based upon selfish reasoning.
Of course, the faith I'm talking about here is not religious or Jesus Christ related in anyway, it's using the simpler definition along the lines of "believing in something for which there is no evidence."
Having said that I also believe that Christian faith is crucial. I believe that when an individual comes to believe in Jesus Christ and all that goes with that, then something changes. First off, when I say believe, I am not talking about just intellectual assent, but more importantly belief meaning that we trust in what Jesus taught and in what Jesus did for us on the cross. I contend that when someone makes that decision with both mind, and more importantly heart, that there is a change in that person’s life that is assisted by the Holy Spirit of God.
I understand. I don't really have an arguement against this, just an alternative view:
My view is that the "faith" is crucial. Back to what I was talking about above, it's the belief in doing good things for the sake of simply being good that's crucial, rather than doing good things for selfish reasons. This difference may not show in our actions, but it is a mindset that is extremely different from one based on self-preservation.
You contend that when Christian Faith is accepted, there is a change in a person's life that is assisted by the Holy Spirit of God.
I contend that when Love Faith is accepted (non-religious, as I have proposed above), there is a change in a person's life that is perpetuated by this unselfish mindset.
In both situations, I would say that the person would be following the Message of Love.
I would also say that the unselfish mindset I am talking about is what you're calling the Holy Spirit of God.
But, this is getting into personal preference and away from what Rob Bell is discussing.
As far as our thoughts about Rob Bell go... I too agree that he's on the right path, but I think he has a longer distance to go as I do not see any importance in the Christian portion of Christian Faith (or, say, the Muslim portion of Muslim Faith). I think it's the Faith part that is important, and simple... just faith that good is good and that we should strive to increase good in our lives and those around us.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by GDR, posted 04-19-2011 12:21 AM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by GDR, posted 04-20-2011 3:16 PM Stile has replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 25 of 30 (612967)
04-20-2011 3:58 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by GDR
04-20-2011 3:16 PM


Re: Lots of questions, just curious
GDR writes:
As to the importance of the Christian faith I see it this way. Is the story in the Christian Gospel true? Was Jesus Christ bodily resurrected? If it is true, then the Christian portion is crucial. If it is not true then there is no more reason to listen to what he has to say than any other man preaching a message of love and peace. It would make him the equivalent of Mahatma Gandhi.
I would completely agree. If the Christian Gospel is true, then I would fully admit that the Christian portion is crucial to Faith.
The same with Hindu beliefs, if their core historic claims (do they have a Gospel?) are true, then I would say the Hindu portion would be crucial to Faith.
I just happen to lean a bit closer towards the "not true" side.
But, like you said, maybe we'll find out when we die. And save me a seat in those lectures, they sound interesting

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by GDR, posted 04-20-2011 3:16 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by GDR, posted 04-21-2011 2:26 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024