Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 157 (8134 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 09-30-2014 11:59 PM
131 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Tali_Zorah
Happy Birthday: Epee
Post Volume:
Total: 736,858 Year: 22,699/28,606 Month: 1,786/1,410 Week: 189/384 Day: 69/56 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   April, 2011, Posts of the Month
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3250
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 2 of 6 (612901)
04-19-2011 10:29 PM


Dwise1, at "Self-Replicating Molecules - Life's Building Blocks, Part II"
Author: Dwise1
Forum: Origin of Life
Thread: Self-Replicating Molecules - Life's Building Blocks, Part II
Message #: 18

Once again, at least one member gave the message a "5", but not a POTM nomination.

A snippet from the message:

Setting aside the improbability of protein molecules and DNA strands forming on their own, the chance that our universe could/would be laid out the way it is, is extremely improbable. It's 1 in 10^133, to be exact.

Now, we know how dice roll. We know how cards get shuffled and dealt. We know how a roulette wheel turns. We know how lottery balls produce the winning numbers. But just what the hell do we know about how the universe came to become the exact way that it did?

Dwise once again managed to pull off doing an eloquent reply to a message that struck me as being a hopeless pile of baloney. Maybe a fair amount of tangential material, but I still find it to be an interesting read.

Moose


    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2014 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2014