Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,458 Year: 3,715/9,624 Month: 586/974 Week: 199/276 Day: 39/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bible Question: What was the First Sin?
John
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 312 (61004)
10-15-2003 12:27 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by zephyr
10-14-2003 5:30 PM


Re: litte off subject
Oh come now! You just aren't looking at the right... ummm... special interest web sites.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by zephyr, posted 10-14-2003 5:30 PM zephyr has not replied

Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 312 (61034)
10-15-2003 3:51 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by zephyr
10-14-2003 5:30 PM


Re: litte off subject
It would appear that the "serpent" got Adam&Eve thrown out of Eden, if we are to believe the christian myth of the fall. Conservative x-ians would say that Adam&Eve really did die in a spiritual sense, as YHWH warned them, but YHWH isn't specific on the matter. Some x-ians assume that Eve thought YHWH was testing her. Or they assume as I did that Eve was stupid and gullible. This seems to be where Jews,x-ians,& muslims get the silly idea that women are the "weaker-sex" as espoused by St.Paul. Well, the story I think, clearly is a brilliantly written myth by "Moses" to explain why men and women have differences, sexually and otherwise, and to explain why humans have a hard time living on earth. What was the first sin? My thinking is that it was probably sex-related, regardless of what the serpent may have done with Eve. AdamEve ate of the tree of the Knowledge of Good&Evil. The knowledge of WHAT good&evil?? The context seems to clue us in here. Adam was "lonely". Adam said, "NOW(WOW)this is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh"!!, Clothes were made to cover their "nakedness" AND Eve is now cursed with great pain in childbirth. I can hear YHWH complaining to his divine-counsel, "Why did those two do THAT without my permission? Blast-It! Now they can create like We can. We must limit them before they "eat of the tree of life", & overpopulate the planet!!"
[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 10-15-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by zephyr, posted 10-14-2003 5:30 PM zephyr has not replied

phil
Guest


Message 63 of 312 (61114)
10-15-2003 10:58 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Rrhain
10-13-2003 7:52 AM


Re: litte off subject
quote:
or is it another name for Satan.
No.
Satan does not go about on his belly.
Too, Judaism had no concept of the devil at the time Genesis was conceived. Why would they include a reference to a being they didn't think existed and had no comprehension of?
Revelation 12:9. . . ."The great dragon was hurled down--that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the world astray. . . "
I know it's the New Testament, but I thought it was worth adding.
Also, I always learned that the book of Job was one of the oldest (if not the oldest) books in the Bible. Job refers to Satan numerous times (all of chapter 1 involves Satan), so I don't think you can safely say, "Judaism had no concept of the devil."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Rrhain, posted 10-13-2003 7:52 AM Rrhain has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Asgara, posted 10-15-2003 11:56 PM You have not replied
 Message 65 by Rei, posted 10-16-2003 1:53 AM You have not replied
 Message 73 by Rrhain, posted 10-17-2003 10:34 AM You replied

  
Asgara
Member (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 64 of 312 (61121)
10-15-2003 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by phil
10-15-2003 10:58 PM


Re: litte off subject
Jewish concepts of Satan are totally different than Christian's. Satan is merely doing the job God gave him. Here is a great site discussing this from the Jewish perspective
Does Judaism Believe in Satan?
------------------
Asgara
"An unexamined life is not worth living" Socrates via Plato
gotta learn how to spell one of these days
[This message has been edited by Asgara, 10-15-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by phil, posted 10-15-2003 10:58 PM phil has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Prozacman, posted 10-16-2003 11:30 AM Asgara has replied

Rei
Member (Idle past 7035 days)
Posts: 1546
From: Iowa City, IA
Joined: 09-03-2003


Message 65 of 312 (61130)
10-16-2003 1:53 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by phil
10-15-2003 10:58 PM


Re: litte off subject
Job seems to be (edit)newer(edit) than Exodus at the very least - for example, " He divideth the sea with his power, and by his understanding he smiteth through Rahab" (Rahab is a name Egypt is frequently called). I've seen a lot of claims that it is the oldest than the pentateuch , but no evidence to back it. One thing that is interesting is the presence of Satan. Satan appears between 2nd Kings and 1st Chronicles - by replacing something that God had done in Kings (God had caused a census there; in Chronicles, Satan did it). Between Kings and Chronicles was the Babylonian captivity, so it seems that he was introduced at that time.
------------------
"Illuminant light,
illuminate me."
[This message has been edited by Rei, 10-16-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by phil, posted 10-15-2003 10:58 PM phil has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by John, posted 10-16-2003 10:18 AM Rei has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 312 (61160)
10-16-2003 10:18 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by Rei
10-16-2003 1:53 AM


Re: litte off subject
Job is generally considered to be the oldest book in the OT.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Rei, posted 10-16-2003 1:53 AM Rei has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Rei, posted 10-16-2003 1:25 PM John has replied

Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 312 (61185)
10-16-2003 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by Asgara
10-15-2003 11:56 PM


Re: litte off subject
The site you have referenced does jive with what I am learning about how people of different faiths other than christianity understand Satan. I was a christian at one time, and I did have this dualist belief that the angel Satan was over and against the christian god, as opposed to being just H's "robot" as you seem to believe. I understand now that the figure of Satan had evolved in the minds of some Jews in the last few centuries BC. One may pick up afew books on the subject of Satan if one is so inclined: "Satan, A Biography,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Asgara, posted 10-15-2003 11:56 PM Asgara has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Asgara, posted 10-16-2003 11:45 AM Prozacman has replied

Asgara
Member (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 68 of 312 (61188)
10-16-2003 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by Prozacman
10-16-2003 11:30 AM


Re: litte off subject
Hi Prozacman,
One little clarification, I don't believe that Satan is God's robot. I personally don't believe in either one. I'm just arguing a poor plot line in a collection of very old books.
------------------
Asgara
"An unexamined life is not worth living" Socrates via Plato

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Prozacman, posted 10-16-2003 11:30 AM Prozacman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Prozacman, posted 10-16-2003 6:15 PM Asgara has not replied

Rei
Member (Idle past 7035 days)
Posts: 1546
From: Iowa City, IA
Joined: 09-03-2003


Message 69 of 312 (61205)
10-16-2003 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by John
10-16-2003 10:18 AM


Re: litte off subject
You didn't address what I said - I stated that I've seen a lot of claims that it is the oldest, but not a single piece of evidence, and there seems to at least be a reference to the exodus in it - in addition to the presence of the character Satan, who doesn't show up otherwise until the Babylonian captivity, where earlier stories get changed by adding in his presence.
------------------
"Illuminant light,
illuminate me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by John, posted 10-16-2003 10:18 AM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Prozacman, posted 10-16-2003 6:38 PM Rei has not replied
 Message 72 by John, posted 10-17-2003 1:16 AM Rei has not replied
 Message 74 by Rrhain, posted 10-17-2003 10:48 AM Rei has not replied

Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 70 of 312 (61259)
10-16-2003 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Asgara
10-16-2003 11:45 AM


Re: litte off subject
Good! I'm glad you don't believe that(YIKES!); Anyway it appears to be a Jewish idea. The early christians, especially St. Paul decided to more directly individualize Satan and make him oppose God.(see The Devil:A biography,Peter Stanford,pp.68-70). And there definitely is a poor plotline for Satan in the OT&NT. Satan seems to go from being "YHWH's obedient prosecutor" to an enemy of YHWH without spelling out exactly how & why it happened. The author I just referenced clues us in with the mention of a few of the intertestament books like Enoch, Jubilees,`Wisdom, Testament of Reuben(sandwich!), etc. He writes that these Apocryphal books help fill in the gaps in how Satan evolves. I hope to read some copies of these books in the near future, and reference them here on this forum for anyone curious.
[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 10-16-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Asgara, posted 10-16-2003 11:45 AM Asgara has not replied

Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 71 of 312 (61262)
10-16-2003 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Rei
10-16-2003 1:25 PM


Re: litte off subject
And, not only adding in his(Satan's) presence, but also making him more malevolent and anti-YHWH as history proceeds. Cf. my reference to Asgara, #71, on "The Devil;A biography", Peter Stanford; a fascinating read.
[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 10-16-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Rei, posted 10-16-2003 1:25 PM Rei has not replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 72 of 312 (61304)
10-17-2003 1:16 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by Rei
10-16-2003 1:25 PM


Re: litte off subject
quote:
You didn't address what I said
You're right. I didn't. Bad week. Sorry.
The placement of Job in the Bible involves linking which other books reference Job in some way or other. The poetic style is also an issue.
The author of the book is unknown, neither can the period in which it was written be exactly determined. Many considered the book the work of Job himself or Moses. It is now universally and correctly held that the book is not earlier than the reign of Solomon. On the other hand it is earlier than Ezechiel (Ezech., xiv, 1 -20). For it is the natural supposition that the latter gained his knowledge of Job from the Book of Job, and not from other, vanished, sources. It is claimed that allusions to Job have also been found in Isaias, Amos, Lamentations, some of the Psalms, and especially Jeremias. Many Catholic investigators even at the present time assign the book to the reign of Solomon; the masterly poetic form points to this brilliant period of Hebrew poetry. The proofs, however, are not very convincing. Others, especially Protestant investigators, assign the work to the period after Solomon. They support this position largely upon religious historical considerations which do not appear to have much force.
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Job
However, I am going to have to change my opinion. Looks like Job may not be the oldest. Gotta do more work.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com
[This message has been edited by John, 10-17-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Rei, posted 10-16-2003 1:25 PM Rei has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 73 of 312 (61357)
10-17-2003 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by phil
10-15-2003 10:58 PM


Re: litte off subject
phil responds to me:
quote:
Revelation 12:9. . . ."The great dragon was hurled down--that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the world astray. . . "
I know it's the New Testament, but I thought it was worth adding.
But Revelation has nothing to do with Genesis.
Or are you saying that anytime anybody uses the word "serpent," they're referring to the devil?
The reason why the word "serpent" is used is staring at you right in the face. It has nothing to do with Genesis and everything to do with the fact that the author of Revelation is describing a DRAGON.
quote:
Also, I always learned that the book of Job was one of the oldest (if not the oldest) books in the Bible.
Not as old as Genesis.
quote:
Job refers to Satan numerous times (all of chapter 1 involves Satan),
Not as some creature that crawls around on its belly. Instead, Satan is a servant of god who does his bidding.
quote:
so I don't think you can safely say, "Judaism had no concept of the devil."
Um, the "Satan" in Job is not the devil as Christians understand him.
In Hebrew "Satan" means "Adversary."
You seem to be functioning under the idea that all of the Old Testament was written down at once. It wasn't. As Judaism evolved, new stories were developed. Judaism did, eventually, acquire a concept of a devil, but that concept is not present at the time of the writing of Genesis. It wasn't until the influences of Zoroastrianism came to Judaism that the devil started showing up.
You can find many of the interesting shifts in Judaic history through the texts and how they treat the celestial hierarchy. Genesis starts with a mention of many gods. As the Old Testament continues on, it slowly coalesces into only one god from whom everything, both good and evil, come from. Then a split starts to happen and we see god as all-good and the devil as all-evil.
So yes, at the time that Genesis was dreamed up, Judaism had no concept of the devil.
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by phil, posted 10-15-2003 10:58 PM phil has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by phil, posted 10-18-2003 9:39 PM Rrhain has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 74 of 312 (61361)
10-17-2003 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by Rei
10-16-2003 1:25 PM


Re: litte off subject
The information I have is that the J text of Genesis was written between 848 and 722 BCE, E between 922 and 722 BCE, P before 609 BCE, and D about 622 BCE.
Job was written sometime about the 5th century BCE.
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Rei, posted 10-16-2003 1:25 PM Rei has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Prozacman, posted 10-18-2003 1:29 PM Rrhain has not replied

Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 312 (61498)
10-18-2003 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Rrhain
10-17-2003 10:48 AM


Re: litte off subject
And a GOOD book on the 'J' tradition, if one hasn't read it yet is, "the Book of 'J', By Harold Bloom, 1990. Fascinating read.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Rrhain, posted 10-17-2003 10:48 AM Rrhain has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024