No, you did not specifically use the words "expert in copery".
Oh, I see. So you actually accused me of something you knew I hadn't done, because you were losing control of this situation.
But you don't think cops accusing people of things they haven't done is something they do when they lose control of situations. You're sure - confident, perhaps? - that I'm completely wrong about that.
But here is your paragraph again.
Yes, I wrote those words. You've now admitted that you've falsely accused me of "accusing you of being an expert in copery". Well, ok. So where in that paragraph do I make any reference at all to your supposed expertise? Please be specific and boldface the relevant language. The language you
have boldfaced is a reference to your confidence, not to your supposed expertise. You know, that's why it says "wall of
confidence" not "wall of expertise."
Again, you seriously can't tell the difference between driving 7 over the speed limit and arm robbery?
That's certainly not on topic in this thread. You should continue that argument in the other thread. You know, the one where you keep promising not to respond to me.
{Non-POTM stuff hidden - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : No reason given.