Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,409 Year: 3,666/9,624 Month: 537/974 Week: 150/276 Day: 24/23 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Would ID/Creationists need new, independant dating techniques??
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4039
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 8.2


Message 138 of 144 (618862)
06-06-2011 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by Chuck77
06-06-2011 1:30 AM


Re: ID and age of earth
Chuck77 writes:
Stephen Meyers is one of the most prominant ID'ers out there and he believes in an old earth. The point of ID is to simply SHOW design. It had NOTHING to do with the age of the earth. It's not an important issude when it comes to ID.
That depends a lot on which cDesign Proponentist you talk to. Yes, some ID supporters will agree completely with the scientifically-accepted age estimate of the Earth. Some will even agree completely with the Theory of Evolution, and simply tack on "...and that was guided by an intelligence with a specific goal."
But there is also a subset of ID supporters who are just standard Young-Earth Biblical Creationists under a different name. They make no secret that the "intelligence" in question is the Christian God, and they believe that "proof of design" means "proof of literal Genesis, with no evolution involved."
The two can be separate, just as abiogenesis and evolution are separate...but not every supporter does so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Chuck77, posted 06-06-2011 1:30 AM Chuck77 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by Chuck77, posted 06-07-2011 2:01 AM Rahvin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024