What kind of evidence would do you? Give me your address and i'll stop by with a converted Muslim ok?
If you had claimed that one Muslim had converted to Christianity, that would indeed be sufficient evidence --- if anyone had doubted you.
This is from the one site I referenced at the other thread that Dr Adequate found fault with ...
I did. Because they were making claims that were untrue, as I demonstrated. In 1990, there were more than 0 Christians in Uzbekistan, and more than 3 in Kazakhstan. Since (whether through design or incompetence) they publish falsehoods, it would be prudent not to believe them.
Maybe Dr Adaquate should stop assulting my character and do a little more research and also email that gentleman since he knows more than him. Has Dr Adaquate lived in the Mideast for three months as He, his wife and kids did? Im going to take Joel C. Rosenberg's word over Dr A's who spends all day online and calling everyone liars. How about you?
I do not, of course, spend all day on line, nor do I call everyone liars.
As for Joel C. Rosenberg, where is he getting his figures from? Having "lived in the Mideast for three months" would not by itself allow him to gauge the number of conversions from one religion to another. After all, I've spent a lot more than three months in the USA, but that gives me absolutely no basis for any quantitative claims about what proportion of people there are converting to what.
You should think more carefully about this. If I told you that I'd lived over two years in the USA, and that more American Christians were converting to Islam than vice versa, would you really take the truth of the first statement as a guarantee or even an indication of the truth of the second?
Finally, I would point out that my post was about Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, which are not in the Middle East. Even if Joel C. Rosenberg's holiday in the Middle East really has made him an expert in
that region, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan are not in fact part of that region.