|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,788 Year: 4,045/9,624 Month: 916/974 Week: 243/286 Day: 4/46 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
You are expected to behave better.
And what did I do?Behave better in what way? Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 420 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
That was a generic "you" not a specific "You".
The Goose should be treated differently than the Gander.Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member Posts: 3988 From: Adirondackia Joined: Member Rating: 6.9
|
I've no idea what you did or didn't do.
I also thought chuck's comments were quite as offensive as hooah's, but sometimes you have to pick your battles. The E side of EvC is supposed to champion reason and tolerance, and words really aren't sticks or stones. Chuck made a fool of himself--don't follow in his wake. You've certainly made your point. Let it go."The brakes are good, the tires are fair."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Just curious:
How many people on this forum have told you that you're a little bitch? By my count it's about 4 or 5...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2132 days) Posts: 6117 Joined:
|
Just curious:
Perhaps it should have been none?
How many people on this forum have told you that you're a little bitch? By my count it's about 4 or 5...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2
|
Not worth a reply
Edited by Theodoric, : I will elevate myself from itFacts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
In Message 109 I complained to Larni for juxtaposing, in his signature for all to read, what I wrote with a less intelligible quote of another member without identifying the writer of either.
Larni, ignoring the protocol of EvC to identify sources of quotes, refuses to comply with my request until being required to do so by a moderator. Edited by Buzsaw, : fix title Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
what I wrote with a less intelligible quote You're joking' right? Less intelligible? Really? And anyway, Admin clarified that no attribution was required. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13035 From: EvC Forum Joined: Member Rating: 2.0
|
If a signature is causing problems then moderators will address it (common problems are being offensive or too long), but in this case the problem was some sort of confusion between message and signature, this is from your Message 100:
buzsaw writes: Had you linked the quote for clarification, perhaps your message could be comprehended But the signature isn't part of the message, and lack of attribution seems a post facto complaint to cover embarrassment that is unrelated to the original problem. If the members quoted have no objection to Larni attributing them in his signature and Larni doesn't mind updating his signature, then since it now contains three different quotes I think attribution might be a good idea. But signatures represent an opportunity for members to express their individuality, so normally signatures are given a lot of leeway.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2290 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 6.9 |
25684652 is a dirty filthy spammer
{Clean-up completed - Adminnemooseus} Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Admin writes: But signatures represent an opportunity for members to express their individuality, so normally signatures are given a lot of leeway. What Larni is doing is personally attacking me on every message he submits. THAT'S A VIOLATION OF FORUM GUIDELINES We could cherry pick anyone's profile and find a few sour ones to parade before the www. Is that what signatures have become? Places to demean one another?? That's sick! Admin, after, you admitted that my form was not included in that of Dawn et al's why should Larni attach mine with his? Why should his post sigs be attacking anyone? Where are moderators who are suppose to be advocating for the creationist constituency?? I object to the fact that it appears that it's all from one writer. That's quoting multiple sources of data, attributing them to one person. Why should the place it's juxtaposed matter? The signature compounds the attack, being it's in every post of his. It's all public for all to see whether it's in the message or in the signature. Anyone with half a brain & knowledge of the meaning of my words can figure mine out. The other is nothing but meaningless gibberish. My signature is is all my own words so I don't need to identify the source. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined:
|
Buzz, I sought to save you embarrassment by not attributing it.
If you would like me to take it down because you do feel embarrassed or for me to attribute to you so that you are not lumped together with other poster's gibberish I would be happy to comply as a guesture to you. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Larni writes: Buzz, I sought to save you embarrassment by not attributing it.If you would like me to take it down because you do feel embarrassed or for me to attribute to you so that you are not lumped together with other poster's gibberish I would be happy to comply as a guesture to you. I'm not ashamed at all of my statement. I want credit for mine and mine alone, but would you be so kind as to cite the context message & thread to which it applies? You know, Larni we can isolate statements of others from many threads which, isolated from context, are not easily understood. The meaning and application are often only understood in context. BTW, it's "Buz," as in "Buzsaw." BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
I shall follow your requests as soon as I get back from the gym.
Would it be acceptable to link your post so all can read the full message, if they wish to do so? Abe: my apologies for miss spelling your name. I shall make sure I get it right in the future. Edited by Larni, : AbeThe above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Larni writes: Would it be acceptable to link your post so all can read the full message, if they wish to do so? I'd appreciate that. Thanks very much, Larni. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024