Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 180 (8022 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 04-23-2014 12:00 PM
168 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: tellmeverbatim
Happy Birthday: AndrewPD
Post Volume:
Total: 724,043 Year: 9,884/28,606 Month: 1,574/2,455 Week: 292/592 Day: 64/59 Hour: 0/19


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
RewPrev1
...
2425
26
2728
...
46NextFF
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 4416
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 4.6


Message 376 of 683 (633857)
09-16-2011 8:06 PM
Reply to: Message 375 by jar
09-16-2011 8:04 PM


Re: So Goose is treated different than Gander
You are expected to behave better.

And what did I do?
Behave better in what way?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 375 by jar, posted 09-16-2011 8:04 PM jar has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 377 by jar, posted 09-16-2011 8:14 PM Theodoric has not yet responded
 Message 378 by Omnivorous, posted 09-16-2011 8:23 PM Theodoric has not yet responded
 Message 379 by Catholic Scientist, posted 09-16-2011 10:13 PM Theodoric has responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 24504
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 377 of 683 (633858)
09-16-2011 8:14 PM
Reply to: Message 376 by Theodoric
09-16-2011 8:06 PM


Re: So Goose is treated different than Gander
That was a generic "you" not a specific "You".

The Goose should be treated differently than the Gander.


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 376 by Theodoric, posted 09-16-2011 8:06 PM Theodoric has not yet responded

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3211
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 8.6


(3)
Message 378 of 683 (633859)
09-16-2011 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 376 by Theodoric
09-16-2011 8:06 PM


Re: So Goose is treated different than Gander
I've no idea what you did or didn't do.

I also thought chuck's comments were quite as offensive as hooah's, but sometimes you have to pick your battles.

The E side of EvC is supposed to champion reason and tolerance, and words really aren't sticks or stones. Chuck made a fool of himself--don't follow in his wake.

You've certainly made your point. Let it go.


"The brakes are good, the tires are fair."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 376 by Theodoric, posted 09-16-2011 8:06 PM Theodoric has not yet responded

  
Catholic Scientist
Member
Posts: 8989
From: near St. Louis
Joined: 01-27-2005
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 379 of 683 (633873)
09-16-2011 10:13 PM
Reply to: Message 376 by Theodoric
09-16-2011 8:06 PM


Re: So Goose is treated different than Gander
Just curious:

How many people on this forum have told you that you're a little bitch?

By my count it's about 4 or 5...


This message is a reply to:
 Message 376 by Theodoric, posted 09-16-2011 8:06 PM Theodoric has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 380 by Coyote, posted 09-16-2011 10:48 PM Catholic Scientist has not yet responded
 Message 381 by Theodoric, posted 09-16-2011 11:44 PM Catholic Scientist has not yet responded

Coyote
Member
Posts: 4530
Joined: 01-12-2008
Member Rating: 3.9


(7)
Message 380 of 683 (633875)
09-16-2011 10:48 PM
Reply to: Message 379 by Catholic Scientist
09-16-2011 10:13 PM


New subtitle
Just curious:

How many people on this forum have told you that you're a little bitch?

By my count it's about 4 or 5...


Perhaps it should have been none?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 379 by Catholic Scientist, posted 09-16-2011 10:13 PM Catholic Scientist has not yet responded

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 4416
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 4.6


(2)
Message 381 of 683 (633881)
09-16-2011 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 379 by Catholic Scientist
09-16-2011 10:13 PM


Re: So Goose is treated different than Gander
Not worth a reply

Edited by Theodoric, : I will elevate myself from it


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 379 by Catholic Scientist, posted 09-16-2011 10:13 PM Catholic Scientist has not yet responded

  
Buzsaw
Member (Idle past 214 days)
Posts: 9158
From: new york usa
Joined: 03-14-2003


Message 382 of 683 (634017)
09-18-2011 8:44 AM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
In Message 109 I complained to Larni for juxtaposing, in his signature for all to read, what I wrote with a less intelligible quote of another member without identifying the writer of either.

Larni, ignoring the protocol of EvC to identify sources of quotes, refuses to comply with my request until being required to do so by a moderator.

Edited by Buzsaw, : fix title

Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.


BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 383 by Larni, posted 09-18-2011 9:08 AM Buzsaw has not yet responded
 Message 384 by Admin, posted 09-18-2011 9:12 AM Buzsaw has responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3645
From: UK
Joined: 09-16-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 383 of 683 (634019)
09-18-2011 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 382 by Buzsaw
09-18-2011 8:44 AM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
what I wrote with a less intelligible quote

You're joking' right? Less intelligible? Really?

And anyway, Admin clarified that no attribution was required.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 382 by Buzsaw, posted 09-18-2011 8:44 AM Buzsaw has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 11390
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.0


(1)
Message 384 of 683 (634020)
09-18-2011 9:12 AM
Reply to: Message 382 by Buzsaw
09-18-2011 8:44 AM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
If a signature is causing problems then moderators will address it (common problems are being offensive or too long), but in this case the problem was some sort of confusion between message and signature, this is from your Message 100:

buzsaw writes:

Had you linked the quote for clarification, perhaps your message could be comprehended

But the signature isn't part of the message, and lack of attribution seems a post facto complaint to cover embarrassment that is unrelated to the original problem.

If the members quoted have no objection to Larni attributing them in his signature and Larni doesn't mind updating his signature, then since it now contains three different quotes I think attribution might be a good idea. But signatures represent an opportunity for members to express their individuality, so normally signatures are given a lot of leeway.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 382 by Buzsaw, posted 09-18-2011 8:44 AM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 386 by Buzsaw, posted 09-18-2011 11:09 PM Admin has acknowledged this reply

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 1540
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 385 of 683 (634080)
09-18-2011 10:04 PM


Spammer
25684652 is a dirty filthy spammer

{Clean-up completed - Adminnemooseus}

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.


Buzsaw
Member (Idle past 214 days)
Posts: 9158
From: new york usa
Joined: 03-14-2003


Message 386 of 683 (634082)
09-18-2011 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 384 by Admin
09-18-2011 9:12 AM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
Admin writes:

But signatures represent an opportunity for members to express their individuality, so normally signatures are given a lot of leeway.

What Larni is doing is personally attacking me on every message he submits. THAT'S A VIOLATION OF FORUM GUIDELINES

We could cherry pick anyone's profile and find a few sour ones to parade before the www. Is that what signatures have become? Places to demean one another?? That's sick!

Admin, after, you admitted that my form was not included in that of Dawn et al's why should Larni attach mine with his? Why should his post sigs be attacking anyone? Where are moderators who are suppose to be advocating for the creationist constituency??

I object to the fact that it appears that it's all from one writer. That's quoting multiple sources of data, attributing them to one person.

Why should the place it's juxtaposed matter? The signature compounds the attack, being it's in every post of his. It's all public for all to see whether it's in the message or in the signature. Anyone with half a brain & knowledge of the meaning of my words can figure mine out. The other is nothing but meaningless gibberish.

My signature is is all my own words so I don't need to identify the source.


BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 384 by Admin, posted 09-18-2011 9:12 AM Admin has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 387 by Larni, posted 09-19-2011 3:35 AM Buzsaw has responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3645
From: UK
Joined: 09-16-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


(2)
Message 387 of 683 (634087)
09-19-2011 3:35 AM
Reply to: Message 386 by Buzsaw
09-18-2011 11:09 PM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
Buzz, I sought to save you embarrassment by not attributing it.

If you would like me to take it down because you do feel embarrassed or for me to attribute to you so that you are not lumped together with other poster's gibberish I would be happy to comply as a guesture to you.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 386 by Buzsaw, posted 09-18-2011 11:09 PM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 388 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 11:03 AM Larni has responded

  
Buzsaw
Member (Idle past 214 days)
Posts: 9158
From: new york usa
Joined: 03-14-2003


Message 388 of 683 (634115)
09-19-2011 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 387 by Larni
09-19-2011 3:35 AM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
Larni writes:

Buzz, I sought to save you embarrassment by not attributing it.
If you would like me to take it down because you do feel embarrassed or for me to attribute to you so that you are not lumped together with other poster's gibberish I would be happy to comply as a guesture to you.

I'm not ashamed at all of my statement. I want credit for mine and mine alone, but would you be so kind as to cite the context message & thread to which it applies?

You know, Larni we can isolate statements of others from many threads which, isolated from context, are not easily understood. The meaning and application are often only understood in context. BTW, it's "Buz," as in "Buzsaw."


BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 387 by Larni, posted 09-19-2011 3:35 AM Larni has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 389 by Larni, posted 09-19-2011 1:10 PM Buzsaw has responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3645
From: UK
Joined: 09-16-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 389 of 683 (634128)
09-19-2011 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 388 by Buzsaw
09-19-2011 11:03 AM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
I shall follow your requests as soon as I get back from the gym.

Would it be acceptable to link your post so all can read the full message, if they wish to do so?

Abe: my apologies for miss spelling your name. I shall make sure I get it right in the future.

Edited by Larni, : Abe


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 388 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 11:03 AM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 390 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 3:40 PM Larni has responded

  
Buzsaw
Member (Idle past 214 days)
Posts: 9158
From: new york usa
Joined: 03-14-2003


Message 390 of 683 (634142)
09-19-2011 3:40 PM
Reply to: Message 389 by Larni
09-19-2011 1:10 PM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
Larni writes:

Would it be acceptable to link your post so all can read the full message, if they wish to do so?

I'd appreciate that. Thanks very much, Larni.


BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 389 by Larni, posted 09-19-2011 1:10 PM Larni has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 391 by Larni, posted 09-19-2011 5:17 PM Buzsaw has responded

RewPrev1
...
2425
26
2728
...
46NextFF
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2014 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2014