Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientific Knowledge
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 304 of 377 (635992)
10-03-2011 4:20 PM
Reply to: Message 297 by Chuck77
10-03-2011 3:55 AM


Re: Is Science Logical?
And then use the answer in the future against us when necessary?
Well, why not?
There are times when you seem to resent being on a debate forum. Well, you come here of your own free will.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 297 by Chuck77, posted 10-03-2011 3:55 AM Chuck77 has not replied

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 338 of 377 (636301)
10-05-2011 1:18 PM
Reply to: Message 334 by New Cat's Eye
10-05-2011 12:05 PM


Re: english 101
But science rules things out by falsifying them, not because of a lack of evidence for them... those things it just ignores.
No, not really. A scientist might perfectly well write: "Of all extant animals, only birds, bats, and insects can fly." This is not because pigs with wings have been falsified (one can only falsify a universal and not a particular proposition) but because there is no evidence for them --- that is, because the proposition that pigs don't have wings has not been falsified.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 334 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-05-2011 12:05 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 342 of 377 (636326)
10-05-2011 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 339 by New Cat's Eye
10-05-2011 1:39 PM


Re: english 101
If I end up with better predictions of the position of a falling body by using Newtonian Mechanics than I do by using General Relativity, that wouldn't mean that Newtonian Mechanics more closely matches reality.
Could you expand on this point?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 339 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-05-2011 1:39 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024