Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Anyone else here in the post-PC era?
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 309 of 429 (636993)
10-12-2011 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 308 by Percy
10-12-2011 4:43 PM


It just won't do the update magic it needs to. I can access it: just not update my brand new iPad.
I shall be talking to an advisor on Friday morning to resolve the problem so I should reserve judgement till then.
But I'm irrationally annoyed that my new iPad and new PC can't get it together to boot up iOS 5.
B'ah!

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 308 by Percy, posted 10-12-2011 4:43 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 310 by jar, posted 10-12-2011 6:38 PM Larni has not replied
 Message 312 by DrJones*, posted 10-12-2011 6:57 PM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 313 of 429 (637001)
10-12-2011 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 311 by crashfrog
10-12-2011 6:57 PM


All that.
New iPod 2.
Says it can't back up my pad due to unspecified error.
It will all come out in the wash, but colour me vexed.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 311 by crashfrog, posted 10-12-2011 6:57 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 326 of 429 (637045)
10-13-2011 4:58 AM
Reply to: Message 323 by PaulK
10-13-2011 2:13 AM


Thanks, PaulK.
I had the 3200 error. I'll wait a while and give it another go.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 323 by PaulK, posted 10-13-2011 2:13 AM PaulK has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 327 of 429 (637046)
10-13-2011 5:06 AM
Reply to: Message 325 by Percy
10-13-2011 4:18 AM


Re: iPad Update Experience
You should still have all of you books on your computer. It's a chore to put them all back on the pad but it' all still there.
Similar thing happened when I put my iPhone on a new PC. I also had lug all my bootlegged music into my iTunes folder on the new PC.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 325 by Percy, posted 10-13-2011 4:18 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 328 by Percy, posted 10-13-2011 5:56 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 329 of 429 (637056)
10-13-2011 6:15 AM
Reply to: Message 328 by Percy
10-13-2011 5:56 AM


Re: iPad Update Experience
There's 200 or so new things that let you, um, well, er, have integrated Twitter?
Yeah, your right it's just about being a bit shiny.
That said I sat watching the 'restore iPad apps' pane flash green. Still, at least it's working now.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 328 by Percy, posted 10-13-2011 5:56 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 331 of 429 (637065)
10-13-2011 7:44 AM


All done and dusted.
Got to say I'm underwhelmed. Wi fi sync is good but apart from that?
Not feeling it.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

Replies to this message:
 Message 343 by crashfrog, posted 10-13-2011 10:35 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 348 of 429 (637094)
10-13-2011 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 343 by crashfrog
10-13-2011 10:35 AM


You can get siri on the iPad 2?
Abe: the wifi sync does not seem to work and I can't link to iCloud.
B'ah!
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 343 by crashfrog, posted 10-13-2011 10:35 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 349 of 429 (637095)
10-13-2011 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 347 by jar
10-13-2011 10:56 AM


The notification centre is for your notifications; so that they don't barge into other apps, like before.
Location based reminders remind you of things based on your location e.g. 'it's 8am, your in the loo, take a dump'.
I think siri is some kind of natural voice comand for the iPohone 4S.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 347 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 10:56 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 351 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 11:15 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 352 of 429 (637101)
10-13-2011 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 351 by jar
10-13-2011 11:15 AM


Well say I'm hard at work playing Doom on my pad and I get an email.
Time was the app would freeze and I'd have to exit Doom, fire up Safari and read my lastest invitation to meet real Russian girls for fun.
Now a ticker tape rolls across the top of the screen without having to exit the app.
I'm with you on the location reminders: If'n I can't remember to buy food when I'm in the shops or telephone patients when I'm at work I should be shot like a dog.
And buggered if I'm going to make any use out of icloud. I make a point of having different apps on my pad and phone because I use them for different things.
I don't want music on my pad, nor do I want games on my phone (well not big time gobbling ones, anyway). And given that a laptop is nearly always on in my house anyway the devices will sync to that perfetly fine.
Can't seem to find anything useful with icloud.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 351 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 11:15 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 353 by Percy, posted 10-13-2011 11:52 AM Larni has replied
 Message 354 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 11:56 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 355 of 429 (637106)
10-13-2011 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 353 by Percy
10-13-2011 11:52 AM


Re: iCloud Question
As best as I can see the only thing to write home about is the permasync iCloud allows.
And given that you start with 5 gigs data storage limit and have to buy more I can't see how anyone can back up thier devices without buying more iCloud real estate.
Unless I'm missing something Apple can shove iCloud up their arse.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 353 by Percy, posted 10-13-2011 11:52 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 371 by Percy, posted 10-16-2011 10:17 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 356 of 429 (637107)
10-13-2011 12:25 PM
Reply to: Message 354 by jar
10-13-2011 11:56 AM


Re: iPad is not iPhone is not ...
And WiFi sync does not seem to work at all.
I'm going to try to get to bottom of that when I get home. I think by enabling iCloud you disable wifi sync.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 354 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 11:56 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 357 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 12:46 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 358 of 429 (637110)
10-13-2011 1:12 PM
Reply to: Message 357 by jar
10-13-2011 12:46 PM


Re: iPad is not iPhone is not ...
To get it to sync via wifi you need to to enable it in the iDevice pane 'Summary' and then go to General on the device, then iTunes sync. It appears you can sync and use the device now, also.
There is also an option to enable iCloud back up on the Summary page.
Hope that helps.
Abe: and, and, and while it is syncing it's beaming comics over from the PC to the pad which I can read as it syncs, during the act of syncing.
I tried pulling the power lead and it kept on syncing, also.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 357 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 12:46 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 360 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 1:47 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 362 of 429 (637115)
10-13-2011 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 360 by jar
10-13-2011 1:47 PM


Re: iPad is not iPhone is not ...
In iTunes on the left hand side of the screen.
Top item is Library.
Half way down if your iPhone or pad or whatever is plugged into the computer it will show the device in the Device heading.
Click that and you access the iPhone or whatever. This screen has several headings, Summary is the one you want, I think.
Hope that helps.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 360 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 1:47 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 364 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 2:24 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 365 of 429 (637122)
10-13-2011 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 364 by jar
10-13-2011 2:24 PM


Re: iPad is not iPhone is not ...
Not as far as I can see. Only needs to be done once, though.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 364 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 2:24 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 366 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 3:18 PM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 372 of 429 (637519)
10-16-2011 10:35 AM
Reply to: Message 370 by jar
10-13-2011 4:27 PM


Re: iPad is not iPhone is not ...
It does work; it's far slower than wired but if you check the right boxes it does work.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 370 by jar, posted 10-13-2011 4:27 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 373 by jar, posted 10-16-2011 10:39 AM Larni has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024