Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   My HUGE problem with creationist thinking (re: Which version of creationism)
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3658 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 322 of 336 (637967)
10-18-2011 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 321 by Coyote
10-18-2011 10:38 PM


CHECK MATE - AGAIN.
The question remains:
Can an action occur without an interaction, namely with one singular, indivisible and irreducible entity - namely with a ONE only?
If not, than Genesis wins. There is no alternative to the duality factor.
QED.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 321 by Coyote, posted 10-18-2011 10:38 PM Coyote has not replied

IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3658 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 331 of 336 (638138)
10-20-2011 5:39 AM


In summary, the REAL reason creationism is negated is not because it is based on myths or is un-scientific. There are no other writings which speak of such stuff and science itself is a by-product of Genesis; as we find that all active and institutionalized laws come from here, as well as the first alphabetical books. None have been able to refute anything, even when scrutinizing to the most bizarre extremities.
All theologies can have their own gifts to offer — or lack of it; but origins, laws, science, alphabetical writings are the exclusive domain of the Hebrew writings; and prevailing as such today with no equivalence from any other sector. Anti-Creationists seem to reject everything because they are rejecting religions as a whole, as opposed to showing anything un-scientific whatsoever in one writings. These remain un-touched; all come from one source; and every premise is 100% science:
1. The universe is finite with a BEGINNING. The rejection we cannot be sure is un-scientific. The thing is expanding! The BBT is fully based on a finite realm!
2. That once there was no science, laws or any identifiable products is correct — obviously by 1 above!
3. That critical actions anticipating life had to have occurred, as exemplified in Genesis — how else — jitterbugging quarks is more scientific - really?! The premises of Darwin does not even mention any anticipatory factors for life — it just produces bones and tendons with shapes that fit whatever it likes! Hey, that’s not even good magic or occultism!
4. That all products and actions, including life, could only emerge from an interaction is indisputable: it takes two to tango!
5. That Evolution is a direct lift-off from Genesis should not need the slightest questioning. But it does!
6. Creationism and Monotheism are not silly premises but universe altering. After all, there’s like just two possibilities, not 1000’s!
7. Of course, a life form must first be completed, then something must trigger it to be alive. Cars too!
None of the above is un-scientific; none have been dislodged; every response was scientifically based. Fact is, for 4000 years now, the Hebrew premises have been a major upset to every generation and still stands. It must be doing something right! Fact is, the Hebrew writings poses a confounding mystery for its period - and appears that way in 2011 as well. To be sure, WTF applies.
Here's my new definition of science:
'THE DINNER TABLE IS READY FOR THE GUESTS'.
Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024