Panda writes:
your argument is that a human is better than a camera?
Well, that is nice goal-post moving.
Well yeah, a human is a intergral part of the eye. No goal post moving required.
Just as a power supply, lense and all other integral componants of a camera are essential to it's operation.
Panda writes:
To answer your 'adjusted' comparison: a camera
used by a human is better than an eye used by a
human
yes it is.
Panda writes:
An eye is not equivalent to the lens in a
camera.
An eye is equivalent to the whole camera.
an eye is equalvalent to a camera? Nope this is the false analogy
because from the start your equating a fully funtioning camera to a eye that is incomplete. Lacking it's needed vasculature, nerves, sensory inputs, etc..