Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House Occupy Wall Street

Summations Only

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Occupy Wall Street
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2578
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 346 of 602 (639078)
10-27-2011 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 326 by Rahvin
10-27-2011 12:42 PM


Re: Oakland
Rahvin writes:
I suddenly have even more respect for Civil Rights and Vietnam-era protesters, who wouldn't typically have been able to combat media spin with video evidence, or to circulate it on a global scale instantly like we can with the internet.
David Brin has been pushing ceaselessly for the right of citizens to spy on their own government. People should be allowed to film police beatings and other such shit from the power structure.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 326 by Rahvin, posted 10-27-2011 12:42 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


(1)
Message 347 of 602 (639079)
10-27-2011 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 342 by xongsmith
10-27-2011 5:48 PM


Re: Oakland
Wouldn't it fuckin' kill the Evil Kings in power of this sorry country to see the demonstrators sporting AK-47s? "Go ahead - shoot a canister at my face, sucker."
Oh I so wanted to see them build a trebouchet and launch the park's weekly supply of excrement up at those vicious assholes joking and drinking champagne. Smear them all with shit.
Wow.
That's not at all what I'm about. Escalation just results in more death.
I'm outraged over a guy who got shot in the face with a tear gas canister. How outraged do you think I'll be if someone gets shot in the face with a bullet?
I don't want cops getting shot. I don't want protestors getting shot. I don't even want the rich getting shot. My goal is the improvement of human life, not the loss of human life. My goal is positive change, not retribution.
Civil disobedience is fine, and I have absolutely no problem with it. But bringing an AK-47 to a rally? I was disgusted when Teabaggers brought guns and talked about "second amendment solutions," and I'm no less disgusted when anyone else suggests the same thing, regardless of the perceived political "side."
Nobody who advocates for violence or guns or killing is on my side.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 342 by xongsmith, posted 10-27-2011 5:48 PM xongsmith has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 348 of 602 (639080)
10-27-2011 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 337 by PsychMJC
10-27-2011 3:15 PM


Re: OPD Crowd Control Policy
PMJC writes:
Video clearly shows the police tossing some kind of device (that explodes, bright light and smoke) directly into the (small, unarmed, nonviolent) group trying to help an injured protester. So there's one gross violation.
I've heard the OPD blaming the officers from "other" places for pretty much all of the bad behavior. Not OUR fault, must have been officers from Petaluma or Navato. It's clearly not the OPDs responsibility to make sure those reinforcements they've called in act in accordance with the city policies. That would be asking far too much. Seems to me the OPD should have been arresting the out-of-town officers then. Weren't they, too, breaking the law?
The mobsters were not unarmed. They were armed with anything they could get their hands on including stones and fire extinguishers, etc etc. All kinds of dangerous stuff was being thrown at the officers.
Given the radical left wing liberal atmosphere in Oakland, it must have been bad for the police and town fathers to stop the destruction violence and rebellion against law authorities. .Had it been in Iowa or Montana etc, one might expect the police to react.
Had they not called in outside enforcement, likely they would've been over-run by the frenzied mobs.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 337 by PsychMJC, posted 10-27-2011 3:15 PM PsychMJC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 349 by Rahvin, posted 10-27-2011 6:58 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 350 by Omnivorous, posted 10-27-2011 6:59 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 352 by Rahvin, posted 10-27-2011 7:05 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 354 by crashfrog, posted 10-27-2011 7:16 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 357 by jar, posted 10-27-2011 7:23 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 359 by PsychMJC, posted 10-27-2011 7:49 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 360 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-27-2011 8:06 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied
 Message 391 by DC85, posted 10-30-2011 12:10 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 349 of 602 (639081)
10-27-2011 6:58 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 6:54 PM


Re: OPD Crowd Control Policy
All kinds of dangerous stuff was being thrown at the officers.
You will of course show evidence of the Oakland Occupy protestors throwing objects at police before the police opened fire.
By the definition you're using, everyone is always armed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 6:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3978
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.3


Message 350 of 602 (639082)
10-27-2011 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 6:54 PM


Re: OPD Crowd Control Policy
Let's be explicit, Buz.
You support the firing of a tear gas cannister at close range into the face of a peacefully protesting Marine vet.
You support tossing a flash-bang into the group of people huddled around the critically injured man.
Is that right?

"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 6:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 351 of 602 (639083)
10-27-2011 7:04 PM


It's Global
Beginning with Muslim nations, the notion of rebellion is spreading globally. It's all indicative of implementing a globalist socialist New World Order. Note that Muslims are participating in the US protests. Assuredly they're active in many nations. This all goes well with the Muslim doctrine, beginning with Mohammed of global dominancy via procreation, violence and rebellion.
Sharia Islam is expanding globally, nation by nation, region by region and increased influence in the UN world body. This all pertains to fulfillment of the Biblical prophets regarding the end times and Armageddon.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 353 by Rahvin, posted 10-27-2011 7:07 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 356 by Omnivorous, posted 10-27-2011 7:19 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


(1)
Message 352 of 602 (639085)
10-27-2011 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 6:54 PM


Re: OPD Crowd Control Policy
About the Marine veteran:
quote:
OAKLAND, Calif. The Iraq War veteran injured during a clash between police and anti-Wall Street protesters wasn't taking part in the demonstrations out of economic want.
Scott Olsen, 24, makes a good living at a software company and rents a hillside apartment with views of San Francisco Bay. And yet, his friends say, he felt so strongly about economic inequality in the country that he fought for that he slept at a San Francisco protest camp after work.
"He felt you shouldn't wait until something is affecting you to get out and do something about it," said friend and roommate Keith Shannon, who served with Olsen in Iraq.
It was that feeling that drew him to Oakland on Tuesday night, when the clashes broke out and Olsen was struck by a projectile that fractured his skull. Police say they responded only when protesters began throwing bottles and other items at them.
Now, even as officials investigate exactly where the projectile came from, and from whom, Olsen has become a rallying cry for the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators across the nation, with Twitter users and protest websites declaring: "We are all Scott Olsen."
In Las Vegas, a few dozen protesters held a vigil Wednesday night, carrying glow sticks and projecting a photo of the Marine in uniform onto the corrugated-metal side of building at their camp.
More vigils were being planned Thursday night in other cities.
Elsewhere, officials took steps to close some camps that sprang up since the movement began last month against what protesters see as corporate greed and a government that caters to the wealthiest and big business.
In Nashville, Tenn., officials imposed a curfew for a camp at the Capitol complex. In Providence, R.I., officials notified protesters that they were violating laws prohibiting camping overnight at a park.
Some tea party groups complained of a double standard, saying they were charged fees to hold their rallies while Occupy groups have not. One group in Richmond, Va., is asking the city to repay $8,000 spent for permits and other needs.
On Thursday, however, most of the talk was of Olsen and who was responsible for his injury.
The group Iraq Veterans Against the War blamed police. Police say they used tear gas and bean bag rounds, not flash grenades and rubber bullets as some demonstrators have charged.
Interim Oakland police Chief Howard Jordan said Wednesday that the charges of excessive use of force are being investigated. He did not return repeated calls seeking comment on Thursday.
Olsen's condition improved on Thursday, with doctors transferring him from the emergency room to an intensive care unit. His parents were flying to Oakland from Wisconsin, his uncle said.
"His mother, this is obviously a heartbreaker to her," said George Nygaard, also a Marine veteran, said. "I don't think she understands why he was doing this."
Olsen, who is from Onalaska, Wis., served two tours in Iraq, felt the anti-Wall Street movement had a chance to create real change, Shannon said. So each night, he would go out to the tent camps and usually called Shannon with his whereabouts.
On Tuesday night, Olsen had planned to be in San Francisco, but changed course after his veteran's group decided to go to Oakland to support the protesters there. Earlier, police in riot gear cleared an encampment outside city hall that officials said had health and safety problems.
"I think it was a last minute thing," he said about Olsen's decision. "He didn't think about it."
Joshua Shepherd, 27, a Navy veteran who was standing nearby when Olsen got struck, said he didn't know what hit him. "It was like a war zone," he said.
Then there was a scramble and he couldn't clearly see the rush of folks who went to Olsen's aid.
A video posted on YouTube showed Olsen being carried by other protesters through the tear gas, his face bloodied. People shout at him: "What's your name? What's your name?" Olsen, however, just stares back.
Shepherd said it's a cruel irony that Olsen is fighting for his life in the country that he fought to protect. "He was over there protecting the rights and freedoms of America and he comes home, exercises his "freedoms" and, it's here, where he's nearly fatally wounded," Shepherd said.
People at OPSWAT, the San Francisco security software company where Olsen works, were devastated after learning of his injuries. They described him as a humble, quiet guy who worked hard over long hours.
"He's been a big piece of what we do here and our growth strategy, so obviously it's pretty devastating for us that he's in the shape he's in," said Jeff Garon, the company's director of marketing.
Olsen had been helping to develop security applications for U.S. defense agencies, building on expertise gained while on active duty in Iraq, Garon said.
Olsen was awarded seven medals while serving in the U.S. Marine Corps, which he left as a lance corporal in November 2009 after serving for four years. One of them was the Navy-Marine Corps Achievement Medal.
Olsen moved to the Bay Area in July, and quickly found friends in the veterans against the war group. The lanky man with a dry sense of humor did not show a lot of interest in politics as a teen he has two tattoos for the group "Insane Clown Posse" on his upper arms, Shannon said.
His tours of duty in Iraq made him more serious, Shannon said.
"He wasn't active in politics before he went in the military, but he became active once he was out ... the experience in the military definitely shaped him," Shannon said.
Seems our veteran is a decorated Marine who served multiple tours in Iraq, and is currently employed, spending only his nights, his personal free time, at Occupy protests.
Is this Marine part of the "rent-a-mob," Buz?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 6:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 353 of 602 (639086)
10-27-2011 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 351 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 7:04 PM


Re: It's Global
Beginning with Muslim nations, the notion of rebellion is spreading globally. It's all indicative of implementing a globalist socialist New World Order. Note that Muslims are participating in the US protests. Assuredly they're active in many nations. This all goes well with the Muslim doctrine, beginning with Mohammed of global dominancy via procreation, violence and rebellion.
Sharia Islam is expanding globally, nation by nation, region by region and increased influence in the UN world body. This all pertains to fulfillment of the Biblical prophets regarding the end times and Armageddon.
Wait.
Your response to questions of whether you support shooting people in the face with gas canisters and using flashbangs on crowds of people...
...is that the protests are a Muslim conspiracy?
Is anybody else here thinking Buz is dropping even farther off the deep end than normal?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 351 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 7:04 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 354 of 602 (639088)
10-27-2011 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 6:54 PM


Re: OPD Crowd Control Policy
They were armed with anything they could get their hands on including stones and fire extinguishers, etc etc. All kinds of dangerous stuff was being thrown at the officers.
According to who?
The officers?
I know that a recent report explains that Oakland police didn't actually use flash-bangs, that was actually "firecrackers ignited by protesters." Risible, to say the least. (No firecrackers, spent or otherwise, were recovered at the scene, though the casings of tear gas canisters and flash-bang grenades were.) But on what basis should we believe anonymous, self-serving police reports? You act like it's not the most commonplace thing in the world for police to react to peaceful, left-wing demonstrations with violence. Happens every time. Armed hooligans at a Tea Party protest? Funny, police can't be found.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 6:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 355 of 602 (639089)
10-27-2011 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 339 by Rahvin
10-27-2011 4:00 PM


Re: Oakland
Being "tough on crime" sounds great to people.
Putting murderers and rapists behind bars and punishing them has a certain appeal.
Few people think of what is or is not appropriate for crime and punishment from the perspective of how they believe they should be treated if they were ever accused of a crime. "Criminals" are typically thought of as subhuman (and that term applies regardless of the crime committed, from stealing a pack of gum to raping a child), and they "deserve whatever they get."
Nobody cares about police brutality, or prison rape, or the realities of solitary confinement, or anything wrong with out justice system because nobody ever thinks they'll have to see that side of the system themselves.
So brutal cops are okay. Who cares if a cop beats the crap out of some child-raping murderer, am I right?
And if police violence is okay in principle, then when someone gets beaten, they must be a criminal, they must deserve it.
The Stanford Prison Experiment should be a mandatory topic of extreme focus in schools.
I just noticed that Buz "jeered" this post. Out of all of the posts Buz and I have exchanged, this is the only one he's bothered to "jeer."
Does this mean that Buz supports police brutality? Perhaps he thinks prison rape is a good thing?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 339 by Rahvin, posted 10-27-2011 4:00 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 358 by Omnivorous, posted 10-27-2011 7:39 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3978
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.3


Message 356 of 602 (639090)
10-27-2011 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 351 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 7:04 PM


Re: It's Global
Buzsaw writes:
Sharia Islam is expanding globally, nation by nation, region by region and increased influence in the UN world body. This all pertains to fulfillment of the Biblical prophets regarding the end times and Armageddon.
Well, then that's a good thing, right?
Isn't that why Israelis have such success raising funds and political support from evangelical churches? Because the existence of a militarily strong Israel coincides with their end-time beliefs?
So you must welcome any spread of Islam if it heralds the Second Coming.
By the way, answer my question in Message 350.
Stop being the King of Jeers and give an honest reply.

"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 351 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 7:04 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 357 of 602 (639091)
10-27-2011 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 6:54 PM


Re: OPD Crowd Control Policy
Do you have any evidence of "mobsters" or is this another one of your unsupported innuendos and assertions?
Do you have any evidence of a "radical left wing liberal atmosphere in Oakland" or is this another one of your unsupported innuendos and assertions?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 6:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3978
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.3


(1)
Message 358 of 602 (639092)
10-27-2011 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 355 by Rahvin
10-27-2011 7:19 PM


Re: Oakland
Rahvin writes:
I just noticed that Buz "jeered" this post. Out of all of the posts Buz and I have exchanged, this is the only one he's bothered to "jeer."
I've noticed Buz delivers more jeers than the rest of the board combined, and dispenses them most freely when he has no effective reply. Wear it with pride
Does this mean that Buz supports police brutality?
I'd say yes.
Perhaps he thinks prison rape is a good thing?
The police use prison rape as an interrogation threat and put vulnerable prisoners into hard-core cell blocks and holding tanks as both punishment and leverage.
I've experienced both scenarios--listening to someone who is sworn to "serve and protect" describe your likelihood of being raped with lascivious delight teaches you something about human depravity.
Like most systems of institutionalized abuse, prison rape serves the institution's purposes.
Buz supports his police.
{At best, slightly on topic. Shall we all try to do better? - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Note in red.
Edited by Omnivorous, : Solidly on topic. But every day in every way, I try to do better.

"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 355 by Rahvin, posted 10-27-2011 7:19 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
PsychMJC
Member (Idle past 1301 days)
Posts: 36
From: Modesto, California
Joined: 11-30-2007


(3)
Message 359 of 602 (639093)
10-27-2011 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 6:54 PM


Re: OPD Crowd Control Policy
Do you EVER.... EVER think about or do ANY research on ANY of the topics you post about? Do you EVER read, actually READ, what people take the time to put together and post here? 'Cause it REALLY doesn't seem like it.
I will gladly admit that NOT ALL of the protesters acted in an appropriate manner. Could you do the same? Fuck no you couldn't. Not a single police officer did anything wrong as far as you are concerned. But that's out of the scope of what you are commenting on anyway. This is one, specific instance I am talking about in the comment you have decided to reply to. You HAD to comment on it but you obviously couldn't be bothered to even find out what I was talking about!
I have a video that CLEARLY SHOWS a visual impairment device being tossed DIRECTLY INTO a small group of people who ran to ASSIST AN INJURED PROTESTER. I can clearly see in this video not ONE SINGLE action is taken against the police by the crowd gathered before they toss the device. I can see NO weapons being pointed at the police. None. Not one.
Further, I have provided the OPD Crowd Policy that SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITS the use of that kind of tactics, even IF someone, somewhere in that crowd HAD been throwing firecrackers!
Where's your evidence of life threatening danger to the police? Got any? At all? Yeah, that's what I thought.
Edit. I would also like to point out that Buz has tucked his tail and ran from previous comments in this thread about vacation. Nothing to say about that either, eh old chap?
Edited by PsychMJC, : Edit

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 6:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 361 by Omnivorous, posted 10-27-2011 8:09 PM PsychMJC has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 360 of 602 (639095)
10-27-2011 8:06 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Buzsaw
10-27-2011 6:54 PM


Re: OPD Crowd Control Policy
The mobsters were not unarmed. They were armed with anything they could get their hands on including stones and fire extinguishers, etc etc. All kinds of dangerous stuff was being thrown at the officers.
Given the radical left wing liberal atmosphere in Oakland, it must have been bad for the police and town fathers to stop the destruction violence and rebellion against law authorities. .Had it been in Iowa or Montana etc, one might expect the police to react.
Had they not called in outside enforcement, likely they would've been over-run by the frenzied mobs.
Do you have any evidence for your self-serving fantasies?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2011 6:54 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024