|
Author
|
Topic: Anyone believe that cats can see ghosts?
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 7 of 46 (640946)
11-14-2011 3:54 PM
|
Reply to: Message 5 by crashfrog
11-14-2011 2:08 PM
|
|
Their acuity is not as good as ours but I would hesitate to say they have double vision.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 5 by crashfrog, posted 11-14-2011 2:08 PM | | crashfrog has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 10 of 46 (640950)
11-14-2011 5:11 PM
|
Reply to: Message 9 by Omnivorous
11-14-2011 4:21 PM
|
|
Yeah. Because they do their thing twilight they have bags of rods and the sharpness of the edges they see is poor as a result. Turn off the anti aliasing on a PC game and it's not too far off.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 9 by Omnivorous, posted 11-14-2011 4:21 PM | | Omnivorous has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 11 by 1.61803, posted 11-15-2011 10:57 AM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 17 of 46 (641328)
11-18-2011 3:50 PM
|
|
|
Never knew this was a cat lover's site.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Cats rule
Besides, dogs drool My avatar cat (Smudge) drools on me all the time when he is excited: ain't just mutts. The good thing about cats is they don't stink of dog.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 24 by Omnivorous, posted 11-18-2011 5:04 PM | | Omnivorous has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 35 of 46 (641487)
11-19-2011 5:38 PM
|
Reply to: Message 33 by Buzsaw
11-19-2011 5:22 PM
|
|
Re: Good And Evil Entities
This is just one more of the corroborative evidences of the Biblical record, regarding the existence of a higher intelligence relative to creatures existing in the Universe The fact that you would use this whale snot spam thread as evidence for the 'biblical record' is clear evidence in how you are woefully underfunded in the reasoning department. And another good reason as to why you are not allowed to discuss certain topics on this site.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 33 by Buzsaw, posted 11-19-2011 5:22 PM | | Buzsaw has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 39 by Buzsaw, posted 11-19-2011 10:32 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 40 of 46 (641517)
11-19-2011 11:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 39 by Buzsaw
11-19-2011 10:32 PM
|
|
Re: Good And Evil Entities
No Buz, I did not attack you personally. I made a conclusion based on your behaviour, rather than your inherent qualities. You may not like my conclusion, but my reasoning and subsequent conclusions are corroberated by the evidence and, as we all know, evidenced and reasoned arguement are the very nub of the issue. Back to the topic: cats and other animals react to things we cannot sense because they have better sense and pick things up we miss. Simple. Not an unevidenced extraneous entity in sight. Abe: I have no issue with you posting. But to use this topic as evidence for your beliefs is very weak, indeed. Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 39 by Buzsaw, posted 11-19-2011 10:32 PM | | Buzsaw has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 42 by Buzsaw, posted 11-20-2011 8:10 AM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 43 of 46 (641564)
11-20-2011 9:00 AM
|
Reply to: Message 42 by Buzsaw
11-20-2011 8:10 AM
|
|
Re: Good And Evil Entities
I back tracked this thread and nowhere has 'mad animals' been brought up except in your posts. How do you get from 'can cats see ghosts' to 'mad animals' attacking humans? But I may as well air my explanation. Son of Sam was a unhinged killer. It is strongly suggested he was a paranoid scizophrenic. Guess what? This is an organic disorder that can be controlled with meds. Some symptoms of schizophrenia are auditory and visual hallucinations, and delusions of reference. So, no demons, just organic psychological disorder. With animals that attack humans? Treat an animal badly and what do you expect? There is no such thing as 'mad animal phenomena'. Edited by Larni, : Spellink
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 42 by Buzsaw, posted 11-20-2011 8:10 AM | | Buzsaw has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2