Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where Did The (Great Flood) Water Come From And Where Did It Go?
Taz
Member (Idle past 3291 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 6 of 432 (642575)
11-29-2011 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Trixie
11-29-2011 5:10 PM


Kent Hovind already proposed the perfect creationist model for this. It was the same amount of water as we have today. The difference is the Earth back then was more flat and soils more evenly spread out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Trixie, posted 11-29-2011 5:10 PM Trixie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Rrhain, posted 11-30-2011 2:51 AM Taz has replied
 Message 11 by Pressie, posted 11-30-2011 5:14 AM Taz has replied
 Message 273 by Evangelical Humanists, posted 05-27-2012 6:11 PM Taz has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3291 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 13 of 432 (642660)
11-30-2011 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Pressie
11-30-2011 5:14 AM


Well, he proposed it, which in creationist talk is the same as evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Pressie, posted 11-30-2011 5:14 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3291 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 14 of 432 (642661)
11-30-2011 12:01 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Rrhain
11-30-2011 2:51 AM


If you think about it, the bible never stated that the entire earth was flooded all at the same time. Therefore, it must have flooded one region at a time until the entire earth was covered. I propose (in creationist terms) that massive tsunamis were responsible and that every part of the earth was covered at some point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Rrhain, posted 11-30-2011 2:51 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Rrhain, posted 12-28-2011 2:49 AM Taz has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3291 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 18 of 432 (642727)
12-01-2011 1:11 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Trixie
11-30-2011 5:51 PM


Not necessarily. Remember that the topic is where did the water come from and where did it go? Same amount of water. Just rearranged landscape. Right before the flood, god could have rearranged the earth's geology and voila floods!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Trixie, posted 11-30-2011 5:51 PM Trixie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Coyote, posted 12-01-2011 1:40 AM Taz has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3291 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 112 of 432 (645179)
12-24-2011 4:23 AM


I'm puzzled as to why not more creationists accept hovind's explanation. Out of all the proposed, hovind's makes the least nonsense.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024